Source author record

Giovanni Pighizzini

Giovanni Pighizzini appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Formal Languages and Automata Theory Computational Complexity Discrete Mathematics Information Theory Logic in Computer Science math.IT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works

6topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Minimal and Reduced Reversible Automata

A condition characterizing the class of regular languages which have several nonisomorphic minimal reversible automata is presented. The condition concerns the structure of the minimum automaton accepting the language under consideration. It is also observed that there exist reduced reversible automata which are not minimal, in the sense that all the automata obtained by merging some of their equivalent states are irreversible. Furthermore, a sufficient condition for the existence of infinitely many reduced reversible automata accepting a same language is given. It is also proved that, when the language is accepted by a unique minimal reversible automaton (that does not necessarily coincide with the minimum deterministic automaton), then no other reduced reversible automata accepting it can exist.

preprint2015arXiv

One-Tape Turing Machine Variants and Language Recognition

We present two restricted versions of one-tape Turing machines. Both characterize the class of context-free languages. In the first version, proposed by Hibbard in 1967 and called limited automata, each tape cell can be rewritten only in the first $d$ visits, for a fixed constant $d\geq 2$. Furthermore, for $d=2$ deterministic limited automata are equivalent to deterministic pushdown automata, namely they characterize deterministic context-free languages. Further restricting the possible operations, we consider strongly limited automata. These models still characterize context-free languages. However, the deterministic version is less powerful than the deterministic version of limited automata. In fact, there exist deterministic context-free languages that are not accepted by any deterministic strongly limited automaton.

preprint2012arXiv

Converting Nondeterministic Automata and Context-Free Grammars into Parikh Equivalent One-Way and Two-Way Deterministic Automata

We investigate the conversion of one-way nondeterministic finite automata and context-free grammars into Parikh equivalent one-way and two-way deterministic finite automata, from a descriptional complexity point of view. We prove that for each one-way nondeterministic automaton with $n$ states there exist Parikh equivalent one-way and two-way deterministic automata with $e^{O(\sqrt{n \ln n})}$ and $p(n)$ states, respectively, where $p(n)$ is a polynomial. Furthermore, these costs are tight. In contrast, if all the words accepted by the given automaton contain at least two different letters, then a Parikh equivalent one-way deterministic automaton with a polynomial number of states can be found. Concerning context-free grammars, we prove that for each grammar in Chomsky normal form with h variables there exist Parikh equivalent one-way and two-way deterministic automata with $2^{O(h^2)}$ and $2^{O(h)}$ states, respectively. Even these bounds are tight.

preprint2012arXiv

Two-Way Finite Automata: Old and Recent Results

The notion of two-way automata was introduced at the very beginning of automata theory. In 1959, Rabin and Scott and, independently, Shepherdson, proved that these models, both in the deterministic and in the nondeterministic versions, have the same power of one-way automata, namely, they characterize the class of regular languages. In 1978, Sakoda and Sipser posed the question of the cost, in the number of the states, of the simulation of one-way and two-way nondeterministic automata by two-way deterministic automata. They conjectured that these costs are exponential. In spite of all attempts to solve it, this question is still open. In the last ten years the problem of Sakoda and Sipser was widely reconsidered and many new results related to it have been obtained. In this work we discuss some of them. In particular, we focus on the restriction to the unary case and on the connections with open questions in space complexity.

preprint2011arXiv

Two-Way Automata Making Choices Only at the Endmarkers

The question of the state-size cost for simulation of two-way nondeterministic automata (2NFAs) by two-way deterministic automata (2DFAs) was raised in 1978 and, despite many attempts, it is still open. Subsequently, the problem was attacked by restricting the power of 2DFAs (e.g., using a restricted input head movement) to the degree for which it was already possible to derive some exponential gaps between the weaker model and the standard 2NFAs. Here we use an opposite approach, increasing the power of 2DFAs to the degree for which it is still possible to obtain a subexponential conversion from the stronger model to the standard 2DFAs. In particular, it turns out that subexponential conversion is possible for two-way automata that make nondeterministic choices only when the input head scans one of the input tape endmarkers. However, there is no restriction on the input head movement. This implies that an exponential gap between 2NFAs and 2DFAs can be obtained only for unrestricted 2NFAs using capabilities beyond the proposed new model. As an additional bonus, conversion into a machine for the complement of the original language is polynomial in this model. The same holds for making such machines self-verifying, halting, or unambiguous. Finally, any superpolynomial lower bound for the simulation of such machines by standard 2DFAs would imply L<>NL. In the same way, the alternating version of these machines is related to L =? NL =? P, the classical computational complexity problems.

preprint2010arXiv

Proceedings Twelfth Annual Workshop on Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems

The 12th annual workshop, Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems 2010, is taking place in Saskatoon, Canada, on August 8-10, 2010. It is jointly organized by the IFIP Working Group 1.2 on Descriptional Complexity and by the Department of Computer Science at the University of Saskatchewan. This volume contains the papers of the invited lectures and the accepted contributions.

preprint2009arXiv

Proceedings Eleventh International Workshop on Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems

The 11th workshop, Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems 2009, is taking place in Magdeburg, Germany, on July 6-9, 2009. It is jointly organized by the IFIP Working Group 1.2 on Descriptional Complexity and by the Faculty of Computer Science at the Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg. This volume contains the papers of the invited lectures and the accepted contributions.