BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Gianfranco Rossi

Gianfranco Rossi appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Software EngineeringLogic in Computer ScienceProgramming Languages

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Set-Theoretic Decision Procedure for Quantifier-Free, Decidable Languages Extended with Restricted Quantifiers

Let $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{X}}$ be the language of first-order, decidable theory $\mathcal{X}$. Consider the language, $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$, that extends $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{X}}$ with formulas of the form $\forall x \in A: ϕ$ (restricted universal quantifier, RUQ) and $\exists x \in A: ϕ$ (restricted existential quantifier, REQ), where $A$ is a finite set and $ϕ$ is a formula made of $\mathcal{X}$-formulas, RUQ and REQ. That is, $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$ admits nested restricted quantifiers. In this paper we present a decision procedure for $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{RQ}}(\mathcal{X})$ based on the decision procedure already defined for the Boolean algebra of finite sets extended with restricted intensional sets ($\mathcal{L}_\mathcal{RIS}$). The implementation of the decision procedure as part of the $\{log\}$ (`setlog') tool is also introduced. The usefulness of the approach is shown through a number of examples drawn from several real-world case studies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

An Automatically Verified Prototype of a Landing Gear System

In this paper we show how $\{log\}$ (read `setlog'), a Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) language based on set theory, can be used as an automated verifier for B specifications. In particular we encode in $\{log\}$ an Event-B specification, developed by Mammar and Laleau, of the case study known as the Landing Gear System (LGS). Next we use $\{log\}$ to discharge all the proof obligations proposed in the Event-B specification by the Rodin platform. In this way, the $\{log\}$ program can be regarded as an automatically verified prototype of the LGS. We believe this case study provides empirical evidence on how CLP and set theory can be used in tandem as a vehicle for program verification.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Proof Automation in the Theory of Finite Sets and Finite Set Relation Algebra

{log} ('setlog') is a satisfiability solver for formulas of the theory of finite sets and finite set relation algebra (FSTRA). As such, it can be used as an automated theorem prover (ATP) for this theory. {log} is able to automatically prove a number of FSTRA theorems, but not all of them. Nevertheless, we have observed that many theorems that {log} cannot automatically prove can be divided into a few subgoals automatically dischargeable by {log}. The purpose of this work is to present a prototype interactive theorem prover (ITP), called {log}-ITP, providing evidence that a proper integration of {log} into world-class ITP's can deliver a great deal of proof automation concerning FSTRA. An empirical evaluation based on 210 theorems from the TPTP and Coq's SSReflect libraries shows a noticeable reduction in the size and complexity of the proofs with respect to Coq.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An Automatically Verified Prototype of the Tokeneer ID Station Specification

The Tokeneer project was an initiative set forth by the National Security Agency (NSA, USA) to be used as a demonstration that developing highly secure systems can be made by applying rigorous methods in a cost effective manner. Altran Praxis (UK) was selected by NSA to carry out the development of the Tokeneer ID Station. The company wrote a Z specification later implemented in the SPARK Ada programming language, which was verified using the SPARK Examiner toolset. In this paper, we show that the Z specification can be easily and naturally encoded in the {log} set constraint language, thus generating a functional prototype. Furthermore, we show that {log}'s automated proving capabilities can discharge all the proof obligations concerning state invariants as well as important security properties. As a consequence, the prototype can be regarded as correct with respect to the verified properties. This provides empirical evidence that Z users can use {log} to generate correct prototypes from their Z specifications. In turn, these prototypes enable or simplify some verificatio activities discussed in the paper.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Automated Proof of Bell-LaPadula Security Properties

Almost fifty years ago, D.E. Bell and L. LaPadula published the first formal model of a secure system, known today as the Bell-LaPadula (BLP) model. BLP is described as a state machine by means of first-order logic and set theory. The authors also formalize two state invariants known as security condition and *-property. Bell and LaPadula prove that all the state transitions preserve these invariants. In this paper we present a fully automated proof of the security condition and the *-property for all the model operations. The model and the proofs are coded in the {log} tool. As far as we know this is the first time such proofs are automated. Besides, we show that the {log} model is also an executable prototype. Therefore we are providing an automatically verified executable prototype of BLP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Declarative Programming with Intensional Sets in Java Using JSetL

Intensional sets are sets given by a property rather than by enumerating their elements. In previous work, we have proposed a decision procedure for a first-order logic language which provides Restricted Intensional Sets (RIS), i.e., a sub-class of intensional sets that are guaranteed to denote finite---though unbounded---sets. In this paper we show how RIS can be exploited as a convenient programming tool also in a conventional setting, namely, the imperative O-O language Java. We do this by considering a Java library, called JSetL, that integrates the notions of logical variable, (set) unification and constraints that are typical of constraint logic programming languages into the Java language. We show how JSetL is naturally extended to accommodate for RIS and RIS constraints, and how this extension can be exploited, on the one hand, to support a more declarative style of programming and, on the other hand, to effectively enhance the expressive power of the constraint language provided by the library.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Adding Partial Functions to Constraint Logic Programming with Sets

Partial functions are common abstractions in formal specification notations such as Z, B and Alloy. Conversely, executable programming languages usually provide little or no support for them. In this paper we propose to add partial functions as a primitive feature to a Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) language, namely {log}. Although partial functions could be programmed on top of {log}, providing them as first-class citizens adds valuable flexibility and generality to the form of set-theoretic formulas that the language can safely deal with. In particular, the paper shows how the {log} constraint solver is naturally extended in order to accommodate for the new primitive constraints dealing with partial functions. Efficiency of the new version is empirically assessed by running a number of non-trivial set-theoretical goals involving partial functions, obtained from specifications written in Z.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access