BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Géza Tóth

Géza Tóth contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COComputational Geometry

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Helly-type theorems for the ordering of the vertices of a hypergraph

Let $H$ be a complete $r$-uniform hypergraph such that two vertices are marked in each edge as its `boundary' vertices. A linear ordering of the vertex set of $H$ is called an {\em agreeing linear order}, provided all vertices of each edge of $H$ lie between its two boundary vertices. We prove the following Helly-type theorem: if there is an {agreeing linear order} on the vertex set of every subhypergraph of $H$ with at most $2r-2$ vertices, then there is an agreeing linear order on the vertex set of $H$. We also show that the constant $2r-2$ cannot be reduced in the theorem. The case $r=3$ of the theorem has particular interest in the axiomatic theory of betweenness. Similar results are obtained for further $r$-uniform hypergraphs ($r\geq 3$), where one or two vertices are marked in each edge, and the linear orders need to satisfy various rules of agreement. In one of the cases we prove that no such Helly-type statement holds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Two trees are better than one

We consider partitions of a point set into two parts, and the lengths of the minimum spanning trees of the original set and of the two parts. If $w(P)$ denotes the length of a minimum spanning tree of $P$, we show that every set $P$ of $n \geq 12$ points admits a bipartition $P= R \cup B$ for which the ratio $\frac{w(R)+w(B)}{w(P)}$ is strictly larger than $1$; and that $1$ is the largest number with this property. Furthermore, we provide a very fast algorithm that computes such a bipartition in $O(1)$ time and one that computes the corresponding ratio in $O(n \log{n})$ time. In certain settings, a ratio larger than $1$ can be expected and sometimes guaranteed. For example, if $P$ is a set of $n$ random points uniformly distributed in $[0,1]^2$ ($n \to \infty$), then for any $\eps>0$, the above ratio in a maximizing partition is at least $\sqrt2 -\eps$ with probability tending to $1$. As another example, if $P$ is a set of $n$ points with spread at most $α\sqrt{n}$, for some constant $α>0$, then the aforementioned ratio in a maximizing partition is $1 + Ω(α^{-2})$. All our results and techniques are extendable to higher dimensions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Crossing lemma for the odd-crossing number

A graph is $1$-planar, if it can be drawn in the plane such that there is at most one crossing on every edge. It is known, that $1$-planar graphs have at most $4n-8$ edges. We prove the following odd-even generalization. If a graph can be drawn in the plane such that every edge is crossed by at most one other edge {\em an odd number of times}, then it is called 1-odd-planar and it has at most $5n-9$ edges. As a consequence, we improve the constant in the Crossing Lemma for the odd-crossing number, if adjacent edges cross an even number of times. We also give upper bound for the number of edges of $k$-odd-planar graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Crossings between non-homotopic edges

We call a multigraph {\em non-homotopic} if it can be drawn in the plane in such a way that no two edges connecting the same pair of vertices can be continuously transformed into each other without passing through a vertex, and no loop can be shrunk to its end-vertex in the same way. It is easy to see that a non-homotopic multigraph on $n>1$ vertices can have arbitrarily many edges. We prove that the number of crossings between the edges of a non-homotopic multigraph with $n$ vertices and $m>4n$ edges is larger than $c\frac{m^2}{n}$ for some constant $c>0$, and that this bound is tight up to a polylogarithmic factor. We also show that the lower bound is not asymptotically sharp as $n$ is fixed and $m$ tends to infinity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improvement on the crossing number of crossing-critical graphs

The crossing number of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of edge crossings over all drawings of $G$ in the plane. A graph $G$ is $k$-crossing-critical if its crossing number is at least $k$, but if we remove any edge of $G$, its crossing number drops below $k$. There are examples of $k$-crossing-critical graphs that do not have drawings with exactly $k$ crossings. Richter and Thomassen proved in 1993 that if $G$ is $k$-crossing-critical, then its crossing number is at most $2.5k+16$. We improve this bound to $2k+6\sqrt{k}+44$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access