Source author record

George W. Collins

George W. Collins appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint1999arXiv

A Re-interpretation of Historical References to the Supernova of 1054 AD

In this paper we re-examine historical references to the supernova event of 1054 AD with a view to establishing a sequence astronomical events which minimizes apparent conflicts between the various sources. We find that the explosion of the supernova is likely to have occurred weeks to months before the commonly accepted date of July 4th 1054. This view is strongly supported by a number of European references to events visible in the evening sky during the spring which are likely to be associated with the appearance of the supernova. We find the best fit to the light curve based on Chinese observations and a maximum visible apparent magnitude for a supernova located at the distance to the Crab Nebula also confirms the earlier explosion date.

preprint1997arXiv

The Cosmological Flatness Problem and Limits on Dark Matter

The traditional argument to justify Omega_0 = rho/rho_{crit} = 1 which suggests an absurdly close agreement between the initial expansion energy of the universe and its binding energy is reversed to show that it is unreasonable to expect the current value of W to be within a factor of ten or more of unity. The Uncertainty Principle is applied to the initial value of the mass require to close the universe. The tiny fractional uncertainty is amplified so that the current fractional uncertainty is of the order of unity. This suggests that the requirement of exact initial agreement between the binding energy and the expansion energy is unreasonable as it can never be tested by contemporary measurement.