Source author record

Georg Gottlob

Georg Gottlob appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

17works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

17 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

MV-Datalog+-: Effective Rule-based Reasoning with Uncertain Observations

Modern applications combine information from a great variety of sources. Oftentimes, some of these sources, like Machine-Learning systems, are not strictly binary but associated with some degree of (lack of) confidence in the observation. We propose MV-Datalog and MV-Datalog+- as extensions of Datalog and Datalog+-, respectively, to the fuzzy semantics of infinite-valued Lukasiewicz logic L as languages for effectively reasoning in scenarios where such uncertain observations occur. We show that the semantics of MV-Datalog exhibits similar model-theoretic properties as Datalog. In particular, we show that (fuzzy) entailment can be decided via minimal fuzzy models. We show that when they exist, such minimal fuzzy models are unique (when they exist) and can be characterised in terms of a linear optimisation problem over the output of a fixed-point procedure. On the basis of this characterisation, we propose similar many-valued semantics for rules with existential quantification in the head, extending Datalog+-. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.

preprint2022arXiv

Non-Uniformly Terminating Chase: Size and Complexity

The chase procedure, originally introduced for checking implication of database constraints, and later on used for computing data exchange solutions, has recently become a central algorithmic tool in rule-based ontological reasoning. In this context, a key problem is non-uniform chase termination: does the chase of a database w.r.t. a rule-based ontology terminate? And if this is the case, what is the size of the result of the chase? We focus on guarded tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), which form a robust rule-based ontology language, and study the above central questions for the semi-oblivious version of the chase. One of our main findings is that non-uniform semi-oblivious chase termination for guarded TGDs is feasible in polynomial time w.r.t. the database, and the size of the result of the chase (whenever is finite) is linear w.r.t. the database. Towards our results concerning non-uniform chase termination, we show that basic techniques such as simplification and linearization, originally introduced in the context of ontological query answering, can be safely applied to the chase termination problem.

preprint2020arXiv

HyperBench: A Benchmark and Tool for Hypergraphs and Empirical Findings

To cope with the intractability of answering Conjunctive Queries (CQs) and solving Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs), several notions of hypergraph decompositions have been proposed -- giving rise to different notions of width, noticeably, plain, generalized, and fractional hypertree width (hw, ghw, and fhw). Given the increasing interest in using such decomposition methods in practice, a publicly accessible repository of decomposition software, as well as a large set of benchmarks, and a web-accessible workbench for inserting, analyzing, and retrieving hypergraphs are called for. We address this need by providing (i) concrete implementations of hypergraph decompositions (including new practical algorithms), (ii) a new, comprehensive benchmark of hypergraphs stemming from disparate CQ and CSP collections, and (iii) HyperBench, our new web-inter\-face for accessing the benchmark and the results of our analyses. In addition, we describe a number of actual experiments we carried out with this new infrastructure.

preprint2020arXiv

Semantic Width and the Fixed-Parameter Tractability of Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are an important formal framework for the uniform treatment of various prominent AI tasks, e.g., coloring or scheduling problems. Solving CSPs is, in general, known to be NP-complete and fixed-parameter intractable when parameterized by their constraint scopes. We give a characterization of those classes of CSPs for which the problem becomes fixed-parameter tractable. Our characterization significantly increases the utility of the CSP framework by making it possible to decide the fixed-parameter tractability of problems via their CSP formulations. We further extend our characterization to the evaluation of unions of conjunctive queries, a fundamental problem in databases. Furthermore, we provide some new insight on the frontier of PTIME solvability of CSPs. In particular, we observe that bounded fractional hypertree width is more general than bounded hypertree width only for classes that exhibit a certain type of exponential growth. The presented work resolves a long-standing open problem and yields powerful new tools for complexity research in AI and database theory.

preprint2020arXiv

The HyperTrac Project: Recent Progress and Future Research Directions on Hypergraph Decompositions

Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) play a central role in many applications in Artificial Intelligence and Operations Research. In general, solving CSPs is NP-complete. The structure of CSPs is best described by hypergraphs. Therefore, various forms of hypergraph decompositions have been proposed in the literature to identify tractable fragments of CSPs. However, also the computation of a concrete hypergraph decomposition is a challenging task in itself. In this paper, we report on recent progress in the study of hypergraph decompositions and we outline several directions for future research.

preprint2016arXiv

Semantic Acyclicity Under Constraints

A conjunctive query (CQ) is semantically acyclic if it is equivalent to an acyclic one. Semantic acyclicity has been studied in the constraint-free case, and deciding whether a query enjoys this property is NP-complete. However, in case the database is subject to constraints such as tuple-generating dependencies (tgds) that can express, e.g., inclusion dependencies, or equality-generating dependencies (egds) that capture, e.g., functional dependencies, a CQ may turn out to be semantically acyclic under the constraints while not semantically acyclic in general. This opens avenues to new query optimization techniques. In this paper we initiate and develop the theory of semantic acyclicity under constraints. More precisely, we study the following natural problem: Given a CQ and a set of constraints, is the query semantically acyclic under the constraints, or, in other words, is the query equivalent to an acyclic one over all those databases that satisfy the set of constraints? We show that, contrary to what one might expect, decidability of CQ containment is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the decidability of semantic acyclicity. In particular, we show that semantic acyclicity is undecidable in the presence of full tgds (i.e., Datalog rules). In view of this fact, we focus on the main classes of tgds for which CQ containment is decidable, and do not capture the class of full tgds, namely guarded, non-recursive and sticky tgds. For these classes we show that semantic acyclicity is decidable, and its complexity coincides with the complexity of CQ containment. In the case of egds, we show that for keys over unary and binary predicates semantic acyclicity is decidable (NP-complete). We finally consider the problem of evaluating a semantically acyclic query over a database that satisfies a set of constraints; for guarded tgds and functional dependencies this problem is tractable.

preprint2014arXiv

Query Rewriting and Optimization for Ontological Databases

Ontological queries are evaluated against a knowledge base consisting of an extensional database and an ontology (i.e., a set of logical assertions and constraints which derive new intensional knowledge from the extensional database), rather than directly on the extensional database. The evaluation and optimization of such queries is an intriguing new problem for database research. In this paper, we discuss two important aspects of this problem: query rewriting and query optimization. Query rewriting consists of the compilation of an ontological query into an equivalent first-order query against the underlying extensional database. We present a novel query rewriting algorithm for rather general types of ontological constraints which is well-suited for practical implementations. In particular, we show how a conjunctive query against a knowledge base, expressed using linear and sticky existential rules, that is, members of the recently introduced Datalog+/- family of ontology languages, can be compiled into a union of conjunctive queries (UCQ) against the underlying database. Ontological query optimization, in this context, attempts to improve this rewriting process so to produce possibly small and cost-effective UCQ rewritings for an input query.

preprint2013arXiv

Deciding Monotone Duality and Identifying Frequent Itemsets in Quadratic Logspace

The monotone duality problem is defined as follows: Given two monotone formulas f and g in iredundant DNF, decide whether f and g are dual. This problem is the same as duality testing for hypergraphs, that is, checking whether a hypergraph H consists of precisely all minimal transversals of a simple hypergraph G. By exploiting a recent problem-decomposition method by Boros and Makino (ICALP 2009), we show that duality testing for hypergraphs, and thus for monotone DNFs, is feasible in DSPACE[log^2 n], i.e., in quadratic logspace. As the monotone duality problem is equivalent to a number of problems in the areas of databases, data mining, and knowledge discovery, the results presented here yield new complexity results for those problems, too. For example, it follows from our results that whenever for a Boolean-valued relation (whose attributes represent items), a number of maximal frequent itemsets and a number of minimal infrequent itemsets are known, then it can be decided in quadratic logspace whether there exist additional frequent or infrequent itemsets.

preprint2013arXiv

Taming the Infinite Chase: Query Answering under Expressive Integrity Constraints

The chase algorithm is a fundamental tool for query evaluation and query containment under constraints, where the constraints are (sub-classes of) tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs) and equality generating depencies (EGDs). So far, most of the research on this topic has focused on cases where the chase procedure terminates, with some notable exceptions. In this paper we take a general approach, and we propose large classes of TGDs under which the chase does not always terminate. Our languages, in particular, are inspired by guarded logic: we show that by enforcing syntactic properties on the form of the TGDs, we are able to ensure decidability of the problem of answering conjunctive queries despite the non-terminating chase. We provide tight complexity bounds for the problem of conjunctive query evaluation for several classes of TGDs. We then introduce EGDs, and provide a condition under which EGDs do not interact with TGDs, and therefore do not take part in query answering. We show applications of our classes of constraints to the problem of answering conjunctive queries under F-Logic Lite, a recently introduced ontology language, and under prominent tractable Description Logics languages. All the results in this paper immediately extend to the problem of conjunctive query containment.

preprint2012arXiv

AMBER: Automatic Supervision for Multi-Attribute Extraction

The extraction of multi-attribute objects from the deep web is the bridge between the unstructured web and structured data. Existing approaches either induce wrappers from a set of human-annotated pages or leverage repeated structures on the page without supervision. What the former lack in automation, the latter lack in accuracy. Thus accurate, automatic multi-attribute object extraction has remained an open challenge. AMBER overcomes both limitations through mutual supervision between the repeated structure and automatically produced annotations. Previous approaches based on automatic annotations have suffered from low quality due to the inherent noise in the annotations and have attempted to compensate by exploring multiple candidate wrappers. In contrast, AMBER compensates for this noise by integrating repeated structure analysis with annotation-based induction: The repeated structure limits the search space for wrapper induction, and conversely, annotations allow the repeated structure analysis to distinguish noise from relevant data. Both, low recall and low precision in the annotations are mitigated to achieve almost human quality (more than 98 percent) multi-attribute object extraction. To achieve this accuracy, AMBER needs to be trained once for an entire domain. AMBER bootstraps its training from a small, possibly noisy set of attribute instances and a few unannotated sites of the domain.

preprint2012arXiv

On Minimal Constraint Networks

In a minimal binary constraint network, every tuple of a constraint relation can be extended to a solution. The tractability or intractability of computing a solution to such a minimal network was a long standing open question. Dechter conjectured this computation problem to be NP-hard. We prove this conjecture. We also prove a conjecture by Dechter and Pearl stating that for k\geq2 it is NP-hard to decide whether a single constraint can be decomposed into an equivalent k-ary constraint network. We show that this holds even in case of bi-valued constraints where k\geq3, which proves another conjecture of Dechter and Pearl. Finally, we establish the tractability frontier for this problem with respect to the domain cardinality and the parameter k.

preprint2012arXiv

The Ontological Key: Automatically Understanding and Integrating Forms to Access the Deep Web

Forms are our gates to the web. They enable us to access the deep content of web sites. Automatic form understanding provides applications, ranging from crawlers over meta-search engines to service integrators, with a key to this content. Yet, it has received little attention other than as component in specific applications such as crawlers or meta-search engines. No comprehensive approach to form understanding exists, let alone one that produces rich models for semantic services or integration with linked open data. In this paper, we present OPAL, the first comprehensive approach to form understanding and integration. We identify form labeling and form interpretation as the two main tasks involved in form understanding. On both problems OPAL pushes the state of the art: For form labeling, it combines features from the text, structure, and visual rendering of a web page. In extensive experiments on the ICQ and TEL-8 benchmarks and a set of 200 modern web forms OPAL outperforms previous approaches for form labeling by a significant margin. For form interpretation, OPAL uses a schema (or ontology) of forms in a given domain. Thanks to this domain schema, it is able to produce nearly perfect (more than 97 percent accuracy in the evaluation domains) form interpretations. Yet, the effort to produce a domain schema is very low, as we provide a Datalog-based template language that eases the specification of such schemata and a methodology for deriving a domain schema largely automatically from an existing domain ontology. We demonstrate the value of the form interpretations in OPAL through a light-weight form integration system that successfully translates and distributes master queries to hundreds of forms with no error, yet is implemented with only a handful translation rules.

preprint2012arXiv

Tractable Optimization Problems through Hypergraph-Based Structural Restrictions

Several variants of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem have been proposed and investigated in the literature for modelling those scenarios where solutions are associated with some given costs. Within these frameworks computing an optimal solution is an NP-hard problem in general; yet, when restricted over classes of instances whose constraint interactions can be modelled via (nearly-)acyclic graphs, this problem is known to be solvable in polynomial time. In this paper, larger classes of tractable instances are singled out, by discussing solution approaches based on exploiting hypergraph acyclicity and, more generally, structural decomposition methods, such as (hyper)tree decompositions.

preprint2011arXiv

Determining Relevance of Accesses at Runtime (Extended Version)

Consider the situation where a query is to be answered using Web sources that restrict the accesses that can be made on backend relational data by requiring some attributes to be given as input of the service. The accesses provide lookups on the collection of attributes values that match the binding. They can differ in whether or not they require arguments to be generated from prior accesses. Prior work has focused on the question of whether a query can be answered using a set of data sources, and in developing static access plans (e.g., Datalog programs) that implement query answering. We are interested in dynamic aspects of the query answering problem: given partial information about the data, which accesses could provide relevant data for answering a given query? We consider immediate and long-term notions of "relevant accesses", and ascertain the complexity of query relevance, for both conjunctive queries and arbitrary positive queries. In the process, we relate dynamic relevance of an access to query containment under access limitations and characterize the complexity of this problem; we produce several complexity results about containment that are of interest by themselves.

preprint2011arXiv

Introducing LoCo, a Logic for Configuration Problems

In this paper we present the core of LoCo, a logic-based high-level representation language for expressing configuration problems. LoCo shall allow to model these problems in an intuitive and declarative way, the dynamic aspects of configuration notwithstanding. Our logic enforces that configurations contain only finitely many components and reasoning can be reduced to the task of model construction.

preprint2011arXiv

Ontological Queries: Rewriting and Optimization (Extended Version)

Ontological queries are evaluated against an ontology rather than directly on a database. The evaluation and optimization of such queries is an intriguing new problem for database research. In this paper we discuss two important aspects of this problem: query rewriting and query optimization. Query rewriting consists of the compilation of an ontological query into an equivalent query against the underlying relational database. The focus here is on soundness and completeness. We review previous results and present a new rewriting algorithm for rather general types of ontological constraints. In particular, we show how a conjunctive query against an ontology can be compiled into a union of conjunctive queries against the underlying database. Ontological query optimization, in this context, attempts to improve this process so to produce possibly small and cost-effective UCQ rewritings for an input query. We review existing optimization methods, and propose an effective new method that works for linear Datalog+/-, a class of Datalog-based rules that encompasses well-known description logics of the DL-Lite family.

preprint2011arXiv

Rewriting Ontological Queries into Small Nonrecursive Datalog Programs

We consider the setting of ontological database access, where an Abox is given in form of a relational database D and where a Boolean conjunctive query q has to be evaluated against D modulo a Tbox T formulated in DL-Lite or Linear Datalog+/-. It is well-known that (T,q) can be rewritten into an equivalent nonrecursive Datalog program P that can be directly evaluated over D. However, for Linear Datalog? or for DL-Lite versions that allow for role inclusion, the rewriting methods described so far result in a nonrecursive Datalog program P of size exponential in the joint size of T and q. This gives rise to the interesting question of whether such a rewriting necessarily needs to be of exponential size. In this paper we show that it is actually possible to translate (T,q) into a polynomially sized equivalent nonrecursive Datalog program P.