Source author record

Geoff Wright

Geoff Wright appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

MeerKAT observations of the reversing drifting subpulses in PSR J1750-3503

We present an analysis of the subpulse drift in PSR J1750-3503, which is characterized by abrupt transitions of drift direction. As the pulsar does not exhibit other mode changes or clear nulling, it is an ideal candidate system for studying the phenomenon of drift direction change. For $\sim 80\%$ of the time the subpulses are characterized by positive drift - from early to later longitudes - while the drift direction is negative in the other $\sim 20\%$. The subpulse separation for single pulses with positive drift, $P_2=(18.8\pm 0.1)^{\circ}$, is higher then for single pulses with negative drift, $P_2=(17.5\pm 0.2)^{\circ}$. When the drift is stable, the measured repetition time of the drift pattern is $P_3^{\rm obs}=(43.5 \pm 0.4) P$, where $P$ is pulsar period. We show that the observed data can be reproduced by a carousel models with subpulse rotation around the magnetic axis using purely dipolar configuration of surface magnetic field. The observed drift characteristics can be modeled assuming that the actual repetition time $P_3<2P$, such that we observe its aliased value. A small variation in $P_3$, of the order of $6\%$ (or less assuming higher alias orders), is enough to reproduce the characteristic drift direction changes we observe.

preprint2016arXiv

Pulsar bi-drifting: implications for polar cap geometry

For many years it has been considered puzzling how pulsar radio emission, supposedly created by a circulating carousel of sub-beams, can produce the driftbands demonstrated by PSR J0815+09, and more recently PSR B1839-04, which simultaneously drift in opposing directions. Here we suggest that the carousels of these pulsars, and hence their beams, are not circular but elliptical with axes tilted with respect to the fiducial plane. We show that certain relatively unusual lines of sight can cause bi-drifting to be observed, and a simulation of the two known exemplars is presented. Although bi-drifting is rare, non-circular beams may be common among pulsars and reveal themselves by having profile centroids displaced from the fiducial plane identified by polarisation position angle swings. They may also result in profiles with asymmetric and frequency-dependent component evolution. It is further suggested that the carousels may change their tilt by specific amounts and later reverse them. This may occur suddenly, accompanying a mode change (e.g. PSR B0943+10), or more gradually and short-lived as in "flare" pulsars (e.g. PSR B1859+07). A range of pulsar behaviour (e.g. the shifting drift patterns of PSRs B0818-41 and B0826-34) may also be the result of non-circular carousels with varying orientation. The underlying nature of these carousels - whether they are exclusively generated by polar cap physics or driven by magnetospheric effects - is briefly discussed.

preprint2012arXiv

Phase-locked modulation delay between the poles of pulsar B1055-52

We present a detailed single pulse study of PSR B1055-52 based on observations at the Parkes radio telescope. The radio emission is found to have a complex modulation dominated by a periodicity of ~20 times its rotational period P (0.197s), whose phase and strength depends on pulse longitude. This periodicity exhibits a phase-locked delay of about 2.5P between the main pulse (MP) and interpulse (IP), presumed to be the opposite poles of the pulsar. This delay corresponds to a light travel distance of many times the light cylinder radius. More complex modulations are found within the MP on timescales down to about 9P, and both these and the principal modulation vary strongly across the (at least) 7 components which the MP and IP exhibit. The nature of the single pulse emission, which ranges from smooth and longitudinally extended to `spiky', is also component-dependent. Despite these disparities, the total pulse intensity distributions at the MP and IP are virtually identical in shape, suggesting a common emission mechanism. In an attempt to account for the complex modulations we examine a number of physical models, both intrinsic (which presuppose the pulsar to be an isolated neutron star) and extrinsic (appealing to the presence of circumstellar material to modulate the emission). Significant objections can be made to each model, so this pulsar's behaviour patterns remain a crucial challenge to theorists.