BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Gentry White

Gentry White contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phApplicationsPopulations and EvolutionSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Mathematical measures of societal polarisation

In opinion dynamics, as in general usage, polarisation is subjective. To understand polarisation, we need to develop more precise methods to measure the agreement in society. This paper presents four mathematical measures of polarisation derived from graph and network representations of societies and information theoretic divergences or distance metrics. Two of the methods, min-max flow and spectral radius, rely on graph theory and define polarisation in terms of the structural characteristics of networks. The other two methods represent opinions as probability density functions and use the Kullback Leibler divergence and the Hellinger distance as polarisation measures. We present a series of opinion dynamics simulations from two common models to test the effectiveness of the methods. Results show that the four measures provide insight into the different aspects of polarisation and allow real-time monitoring of social networks for indicators of polarisation. The three measures, the spectral radius, Kullback Leibler divergence and Hellinger distance, smoothly delineated between different amounts of polarisation, i.e. how many cluster there were in the simulation, while also measuring with more granularity how close simulations were to consensus. Min-max flow failed to accomplish such nuance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Person-to-person opinion dynamics: an empirical study using an online game

A model needs to make verifiable predictions to have any scientific value. In opinion dynamics, the study of how individuals exchange opinions with one another, there are many theoretical models which attempt to model opinion exchange, one of which is the Martins model, which differs from other models by using a parameter that is easier to control for in an experiment. In this paper, we have designed an experiment to verify the Martins model and contribute to the experimental design in opinion dynamic with our novel method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The effect of biologically mediated decay rates on modelling soil carbon sequestration in agricultural settings

Microbial biomass carbon (MBC), a crucial soil labile carbon fraction, is the most active component of the soil organic carbon (SOC) that regulates bio-geochemical processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Some studies in the literature ignore the effect of microbial population growth on carbon decomposition rates. In reality, we might expect that the decomposition rate should be related to the population of microbes in the soil and have a positive relationship with the size of the microbial biomass pool. In this study, we explore the effect of microbial population growth on the accuracy of modelling soil carbon sequestration by developing and comparing two soil carbon models that consider a carrying capacity and limit to the growth of the microbial pool. We apply our models to three datasets, two small and one large datasets, and we select the best model in terms of having the best predictive performance through two model selection methods. Through this analysis we reveal that commonly used complex soil carbon models can over-fit in the presence of both small and large time-series datasets, and our simpler model can produce more accurate predictions. We conclude that considering the microbial population growth in a soil carbon model improves the accuracy of a model in the presence of a large dataset.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access