A countable set of directions is sufficient for Steiner symmetrization
A countable dense set of directions is sufficient for Steiner symmetrization, but the order of directions matters.
Discover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Gaoyong Zhang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
A countable dense set of directions is sufficient for Steiner symmetrization, but the order of directions matters.
H. Busemann and C. M. Petty posed the following problem in 1956: If K and L are origin-symmetric convex bodies in R^n and for each hyperplane H through the origin the volumes of their central slices satisfy vol(K cap H) < vol(L cap H), does it follow that the volumes of the bodies themselves satisfy vol(K) < vol(L)? The problem is trivially positive in R^2. However, a surprising negative answer for n <= 12 was given by Larman and Rogers in 1975. Subsequently, a series of contributions were made to reduce the dimensions to n >= 5 by a number of authors. That is, the problem has a negative answer for n >= 5. It was proved by Gardner that the problem has a positive answer for n=3. The case of n=4 was considered in [Ann. of Math. (2) 140 (1994), 331-346], but the answer given there is not correct. This paper presents the correct solution, namely, the Busemann-Petty problem has a positive solution in R^4, which, together with results of other cases, brings the Busemann-Petty problem to a conclusion.