Researcher profile

Gábor Rácz

Gábor Rácz contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Constraints on AvERA Cosmologies from Cosmic Chronometers and Type Ia Supernovae

We constrain AvERA cosmologies in comparison with the flat $Λ$CDM model using cosmic chronometer (CC) data and the Pantheon+ sample of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). The analysis includes fits to both CC and SN datasets using the \texttt{dynesty} dynamic nested sampling algorithm. For model comparison, we use the Bayesian model evidences and Anderson-Darling tests applied to the normalized residuals to assess consistency with a standard normal distribution. Best-fit parameters are derived within the redshift ranges $z \leq 2$ for CCs and $z \leq 2.3$ for SNe. For the baseline AvERA cosmology, we obtain best-fit values of the Hubble constant of ${H_0=68.32_{-3.27}^{+3.21}~\mathrm{km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}}$ from the CC analysis and ${H_0=71.99_{-1.03}^{+1.05}~\mathrm{km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}}$ from the SN analysis, each consistent within $1σ$ with the corresponding AvERA simulation value of $H(z=0)$. While both the CC and SN datasets yield higher Bayesian evidence for the flat $Λ$CDM model, they favor the AvERA cosmologies according to the Anderson-Darling test. We have identified signs of overfitting in each model, which suggests the possibility of overestimating the uncertainties in the Pantheon+ covariance matrix.

preprint2022arXiv

An empirical nonlinear power spectrum overdensity-response

Context. The overdensity inside a cosmological sub-volume and the tidal fields from its surroundings affect the matter distribution of the region. The resulting difference between the local and global power spectra is characterized by the response function. Aims. Our aim is to provide a new, simple, and accurate formula for the power spectrum overdensity response at highly nonlinear scales based on the results of cosmological simulations and paying special attention to the lognormal nature of the density field. Methods. We measured the dark matter power spectrum amplitude as a function of the overdensity ($δ_W$) in $N$-body simulation subsamples. We show that the response follows a power-law form in terms of $(1+δ_W)$, and we provide a new fit in terms of the variance, $σ(L)$, of a sub-volume of size $L$. Results. Our fit has a similar accuracy and a comparable complexity to second-order standard perturbation theory on large scales, but it is also valid for nonlinear (smaller) scales, where perturbation theory needs higher-order terms for a comparable precision. Furthermore, we show that the lognormal nature of the overdensity distribution causes a previously unidentified bias: the power spectrum amplitude for a subsample with an average density is typically underestimated by about $-2σ^2$. Although this bias falls to the sub-percent level above characteristic scales of $200Mpch^{-1}$, taking it into account improves the accuracy of estimating power spectra from zoom-in simulations and smaller high-resolution surveys embedded in larger low-resolution volumes.

preprint2020arXiv

A common explanation of the Hubble tension and anomalous cold spots in the CMB

The standard cosmological paradigm narrates a reassuring story of a universe currently dominated by an enigmatic dark energy component. Disquietingly, its universal explaining power has recently been challenged by, above all, the $\sim4σ$ tension in the values of the Hubble constant. Another, less studied anomaly is the repeated observation of integrated Sachs-Wolfe imprints $\sim5\times$ stronger than expected in the $Λ$CDM model from R>100 $Mpc/h$ super-structures. Here we show that the inhomogeneous AvERA model of emerging curvature is capable of telling a plausible albeit radically different story that explains both observational anomalies without dark energy. We demonstrate that while stacked imprints of R>100 $Mpc/h$ supervoids in cosmic microwave background temperature maps can discriminate between the AvERA and $Λ$CDM models, their characteristic differences may remain hidden using alternative void definitions and stacking methodologies. Testing the extremes, we then also show that the CMB Cold Spot can plausibly be explained in the AvERA model as an ISW imprint. The coldest spot in the AvERA map is aligned with multiple low-$z$ supervoids with R>100 $Mpc/h$ and central underdensity $δ_{0}\approx-0.3$, resembling the observed large-scale galaxy density field in the Cold Spot area. We hence conclude that the anomalous imprint of supervoids may well be the canary in the coal mine, and existing observational evidence for dark energy should be re-interpreted to further test alternative models.