BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

G. Reza Jafari

G. Reza Jafari contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phq-fin.CPq-fin.STBiological PhysicsMolecular Networksphysics.data-an

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Financial Crisis in the Framework of Non-zero Temperature Balance Theory

Financial crises are known as crashes that result in a sudden loss of value of financial assets in large part and they continue to occur from time to time surprisingly. In order to discover features of the financial network, the pairwise interaction of stocks has been considered in many research, but the existence of the strong correlation of stocks and their collective behavior in crisis made us address higher-order interactions. Hence, in this study, we investigate financial networks by triplet interaction in the framework of balance theory. Due to detecting the contribution of higher-order interactions in understanding the complex behavior of stocks we take the advantage of the orders parameters of the higher-order interactions. Looking at real data of financial market obtained from $S\&P500$ through the lens of balance theory for the quest of network structure in different periods of time near and far from crisis reveals the existence of a structural difference of the network that corresponds to different periods of time. Here, we address two well-known crises the Great regression (2008) and the Covid-19 recession (2020). Results show an ordered structure forms on-crisis in the financial network while stocks behave independently far from a crisis. The formation of the ordered structure of stocks in crisis makes the network resistant against disorder. The resistance of the ordered structure against applying a disorder (temperature) can measure the crisis strength and determine the temperature at which the network transits. There is a critical temperature, $T_{c}$, in the language of statistical mechanics and mean-field approach which above, the ordered structure destroys abruptly and a first-order phase transition occurs. The stronger the crisis, the higher the critical temperature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

High participation ratio genes in the interaction network structure

Genes have specific functional roles, however, since they are dependent on each other, they can play a structural role within a network structure of their interactions. In this study, we analyze the structure of the gene interaction network and detect the most contributing genes through the random matrix theory. Specifically, we compare the interaction network of essential and nonessential genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Most remarkably, this well-established combined framework by measuring the node participation ratio $(NPR)$ index helps detect important genes, which control the insightful structural patterns in the underlying networks. Results indicate that the essential genes have higher values of $NPR$ rather than the nonessential ones which means that they have the most contribution to the network structure. It is worth mentioning that among all essential genes, the $NPR$ value of 5 significant ones is considerably higher than the other essential genes, and also the same is for 15 significant nonessential genes compared to the others. Thus, the significant essential genes strongly manage their network structure, while the significant nonessential genes, besides their global contributions, have weak effects on their network structure. Most strikingly, these genes existing in a limited number of structural patterns are responsible for the specific bioprocesses which are the signature of their networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Competitive Balance Theory: Modeling conflict of interest in a heterogeneous network

The dynamics of networks on Heider balance theory moves toward reducing the tension by constantly reevaluating the interactions to achieve a state of balance. Conflict of interest, however, is inherent in most complex systems; frequently, there are multiple ideals or states of balance, and moving towards one could work against another. In this paper, by introducing the competitive balance theory, we study the evolution of balance in the presence of conflicts of interest. In our model, the assumption is that different states of balance compete in the evolution process to dominate the system. We ask, whether, through these interactions, different states of balance compete to prevail their own ideals or a set of co-existing ideals in a balanced condition is a possible outcome. The results show that although there is a symmetry in the type of balance, the system either evolves towards a symmetry breaking where one of the states of balance dominates the system, or, less frequently, the competing states of balance co exist in a jammed state.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Individual versus Social Benefit on the Heterogeneous Networks

The focus of structural balance theory is dedicated to social benefits, while in a real network individual benefits sometimes get the importance as well. In Strauss's model, the local minima are modeled by considering an individual term besides a social one and the assumption is based on equal strength of individual benefits. The results show that the competition between two terms leads to a phase transition between individual and social benefits and there is a critical point, $CP$, that represents a first-order phase transition in the network. Concerning a real network of relations, individuals adjust the strength of their relationships based on the benefits they acquire from. Therefore, addressing heterogeneity in the individual interactions, we study a modified version of Strauss's model in which the first term represents the heterogeneous individual benefit by $θ_{ij}$, and the coefficient of the second term, $α$, measures the strength of social benefit. Our studies show that there is a region where the triangles are in a crumpled state rather than being dispersed in the network and increasing the heterogeneity of individual benefits results in the narrower region of crumpled state. Out of this region, the network is a mixture of links and triangles and the value of $α$ determines whether the individual benefit or social benefit overcomes. For the small value of $α$ the individual benefit dominates whereas in the large value of $α$ the social benefit overcomes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Analysis of the Global Banking Network by Random Matrix Theory

Since 2008, the network analysis of financial systems is one of the most important subjects in economics. In this paper, we have used the complexity approach and Random Matrix Theory (RMT) for analyzing the global banking network. By applying this method on a cross border lending network, it is shown that the network has been denser and the connectivity between peripheral nodes and the central section has risen. Also, by considering the collective behavior of the system and comparing it with the shuffled one, we can see that this network obtains a specific structure. By using the inverse participation ratio concept, we can see that after 2000, the participation of different modes to the network has increased and tends to the market mode of the system. Although no important change in the total market share of trading occurs, through the passage of time, the contribution of some countries in the network structure has increased. The technique proposed in the paper can be useful for analyzing different types of interaction networks between countries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Mapping Coupled Time-series Onto Complex Network

In order to extract hidden joint information from two possibly uncorrelated time-series, we explored the measures of network science. Alongside common methods in time-series analysis of the economic markets, mapping the joint structure of two time-series onto a network provides insight into hidden aspects embedded in the couplings. We discretize the amplitude of two time-series and investigate relative simultaneous locations of those amplitudes. Each segment of a discretized amplitude is considered as a node. The simultaneity of the amplitudes of the two time-series is considered as the edges in the network. The frequency of occurrences forms the weighted edges. In order to extract information, we need to measure that to what extent the coupling deviates from the coupling of two uncoupled series. Also, we need to measure that to what extent the couplings inherit their characteristics from a Gaussian distribution or a non-Gaussian distribution. We mapped the network from two surrogate time-series. The results show that the couplings of markets possess some features which diverge from the same features of the network mapped from white noise, and from the network mapped from two surrogate time-series. These deviations prove that there exist joint information and cross-correlation therein. By applying the network's topological and statistical measures and the deformation ratio in the joint probability distribution, we distinguished basic structures of cross-correlation and coupling of cross-markets. It was discovered that even two possibly known uncorrelated markets may possess some joint patterns with each other. Thereby, those markets should be examined as coupled and \textit{weakly} coupled markets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Scaling Features of Price-Volume Cross-Correlation

Price without transaction makes no sense. Trading volume authenticates its corresponding price, so there exist mutual information and correlation between price and trading volume. We are curious about fractal features of this correlation and need to know how structures in different scales translate information. To explore the influence of investment size (trading volume), price-wise (gain/loss), and time-scale effects, we analyzed the price and trading volume and their coupling by applying the MF-DXA method. Our results imply that price, trading volume, and price-volume coupling exhibit a power law and are also multifractal. Meanwhile, considering developed markets, the price-volume couplings are significantly negatively correlated. However, in emerging markets, the price has less of a contribution to price-volume coupling. In emerging markets in comparison with the developed markets, trading volume and price are more independent.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access