Researcher profile

G. J. Kramer

G. J. Kramer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Bifurcations of the magnetic axis and the alternating-hyperbolic sawtooth

We present a sawtooth model that explains observations where the central safety factor, $q_0$, stays well below one, which is irreconcilable with current models that predict a reset to $q_0=1$ after the crash. We identify the structure of the field around the magnetic axis with elements of the Lie group $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})$ and find a transition to an alternating-hyperbolic geometry when $q_0=2/3$. This transition is driven by an ideal MHD instability and leads to a chaotic magnetic field near the axis.

preprint2020arXiv

Two-section reactor model for autothermal reforming of methane to synthesis gas

A one-dimensional and stationary reactor model is presented to describe the catalytic conversion of a gaseous hydrocarbon fuel with air and steam to synthesis gas by autothermal reforming (ATR) and catalytic partial oxidation (CPO). The model defines two subsequent sections in the reactor, namely an upstream oxidation section, and a downstream reforming section. In the oxidation section all of the oxygen is converted, with partial conversion of the fuel. An empirical fuel utilization ratio is used to quantify which part of the fuel is converted in the oxidation section as function of the relative flows of air and steam. In the oxidation section, the gas temperature rapidly increases toward the toptemperature at the intersection with the reforming section. In this section the temperature decreases while the fuel is further converted with water and CO2 as oxidant. For methane as fuel, simulation results are presented and compared with experiments. For multicomponent fuels such as natural gas and naphtha, it is described how the two-section model can be applied.

preprint2000arXiv

A consistent analysis of (e,e'p) and (d,3He) experiments

The apparent discrepancy between spectroscopic factors obtained in (e,e'p) and (d,3He) experiments is investigated. This is performed first for 48Ca(e,e'p) and 48Ca(d,3He) experiments and then for other nuclei. It is shown that the discrepancy disappears if the (d,3He) experiments are re-analyzed with a non-local finite range DWBA analysis with a bound-state wave function that is obtained from (e,e'p) experiments.