Researcher profile

G. I. Leviev

G. I. Leviev contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2010arXiv

Measurement of the ac conductivity of a niobium single crystal in a swept magnetic field

We report results of experimental studies of ac susceptibility of Nb single crystal at low frequencies in swept magnetic fields applied parallel to the surface. Analysis of the experimental data shows that the swept magnetic field significantly changes the vortex conductivity in the bulk. It becomes dissipative with unexpected large frequency dispersion. At the surface, one observes a layer with enhanced conductivity in comparison to the bulk. This layer provides a considerably large contribution to the shielding and absorption of an ac field even in dc fields below $H_{c2}$. We have also demonstrated that the swept magnetic field apparently affects an ac response of the surface superconducting states.

preprint2009arXiv

Surface superconducting states in yttrium hexaboride single crystal in a tilted magnetic field

We present the results of an experimental study of the nucleation of superconductivity at the surface of a single crystal YB$_6$ in a tilted dc magnetic field. A recently developed experimental technique allowed us to determine $H_{c3}$ at each side of the sample as a function of the angle between the dc magnetic field and the surface. Experiment shows that the ratio $H_{c3}/ H_{c2}\approx 1.28 $ in the direction perpendicular to the surface dc field while according to the theory this ratio should be equal to 1. This sharp distinction cannot be ascribed to the surface roughness.