Source author record

Fu-Tao Hu

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

15works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

15 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Spectra of weighted uniform hypertrees

Let TT be a kk-tree equipped with a weighting function $\w: V(T)\cup E(T)\rightarrow \C$, where k≥3k \geq 3. The weighted matching polynomial of the weighted kk-tree $(T,\w)$ is defined to be $$ μ(T,\w,x)= \sum_{M \in \mathcal{M}(T)}(-1)^{|M|}\prod_{e \in E(M)}\mathbf{w}(e)^k \prod_{v \in V(T)\backslash V(M)}(x-\w(v)), $$ where M(T)\mathcal{M}(T) denotes the set of matchings (including empty set) of TT. In this paper, we investigate the eigenvalues of the adjacency tensor $\A(T,\w)$ of the weighted kk-tree $(T,\w)$. The main result provides that $\w(v)$ is an eigenvalue of $\A(T,\w)$ for every v∈V(T)v\in V(T), and if $λ\neq \w(v)$ for every v∈V(T)v\in V(T), then λλ is an eigenvalue of $\A(T,\w)$ if and only if there exists a subtree T′T' of TT such that λλ is a root of $μ(T',\w,x)$. Moreover, the spectral radius of $\A(T,\w)$ is equal to the largest root of $μ(T,\w,x)$ when $\w$ is real and nonnegative. The result extends a work by Clark and Cooper ({\em On the adjacency spectra of hypertrees, Electron. J. Combin., 25 (2)(2018) #\#P2.48}) to weighted kk-trees. As applications, two analogues of the above work for the Laplacian and the signless Laplacian tensors of kk-trees are obtained.

preprint2015arXiv

Resistance distances in corona and neighborhood corona graphs with Laplacian generalized inverse approach

Let G1G_1 and G2G_2 be two graphs on disjoint sets of n1n_1 and n2n_2 vertices, respectively. The corona of graphs G1G_1 and G2G_2, denoted by G1∘G2G_1\circ G_2, is the graph formed from one copy of G1G_1 and n1n_1 copies of G2G_2 where the ii-th vertex of G1G_1 is adjacent to every vertex in the ii-th copy of G2G_2. The neighborhood corona of G1G_1 and G2G_2, denoted by G1⋄G2G_1\diamond G_2, is the graph obtained by taking one copy of G1G_1 and n1n_1 copies of G2G_2 and joining every neighbor of the ii-th vertex of G1G_1 to every vertex in the ii-th copy of G2G_2 by a new edge. In this paper, the Laplacian generalized inverse for the graphs G1∘G2G_1\circ G_2 and G1⋄G2G_1\diamond G_2 are investigated, based on which the resistance distances of any two vertices in G1∘G2G_1\circ G_2 and G1⋄G2G_1\diamond G_2 can be obtained. Moreover, some examples as applications are presented, which illustrate the correction and efficiency of the proposed method.

preprint2014arXiv

Asymptotic Laplacian-Energy-Like Invariant of Lattices

Let μ1≥μ2≥⋯≥μnμ_1\ge μ_2\ge\cdots\geμ_n denote the Laplacian eigenvalues of GG with nn vertices. The Laplacian-energy-like invariant, denoted by LEL(G)=∑i=1n−1μiLEL(G)= \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\sqrt{μ_i}, is a novel topological index. In this paper, we show that the Laplacian-energy-like per vertex of various lattices is independent of the toroidal, cylindrical, and free boundary conditions. Simultaneously, the explicit asymptotic values of the Laplacian-energy-like in these lattices are obtained. Moreover, our approach implies that in general the Laplacian-energy-like per vertex of other lattices is independent of the boundary conditions.

preprint2014arXiv

The Algorithmic Complexity of Bondage and Reinforcement Problems in bipartite graphs

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset D⊆VD\subseteq V is a dominating set if every vertex not in DD is adjacent to a vertex in DD. The domination number of GG, denoted by γ(G)γ(G), is the smallest cardinality of a dominating set of GG. The bondage number of a nonempty graph GG is the smallest number of edges whose removal from GG results in a graph with domination number larger than γ(G)γ(G). The reinforcement number of GG is the smallest number of edges whose addition to GG results in a graph with smaller domination number than γ(G)γ(G). In 2012, Hu and Xu proved that the decision problems for the bondage, the total bondage, the reinforcement and the total reinforcement numbers are all NP-hard in general graphs. In this paper, we improve these results to bipartite graphs.

preprint2014arXiv

The Laplacian polynomial of graphs derived from regular graphs and applications

Let R(G)R(G) be the graph obtained from GG by adding a new vertex corresponding to each edge of GG and by joining each new vertex to the end vertices of the corresponding edge. Let RT(G)RT(G) be the graph obtained from R(G)R(G) by adding a new edge corresponding to every vertex of GG, and by joining each new edge to every vertex of GG. In this paper, we determine the Laplacian polynomials of RT(G)RT(G) of a regular graph GG. Moreover, we derive formulae and lower bounds of Kirchhoff index of the graphs. Finally we also present the formulae for calculating the Kirchhoff index of some special graphs as applications, which show the correction and efficiency of the proposed results.

preprint2012arXiv

On the diameter of the Kronecker product graph

Let G1G_1 and G2G_2 be two undirected nontrivial graphs. The Kronecker product of G1G_1 and G2G_2 denoted by G1⊗G2G_1\otimes G_2 with vertex set V(G1)×V(G2)V(G_1)\times V(G_2), two vertices x1x2x_1x_2 and y1y2y_1y_2 are adjacent if and only if (x1,y1)∈E(G1)(x_1,y_1)\in E(G_1) and (x2,y2)∈E(G2)(x_2,y_2)\in E(G_2). This paper presents a formula for computing the diameter of G1⊗G2G_1\otimes G_2 by means of the diameters and primitive exponents of factor graphs.

preprint2012arXiv

On the p-reinforcement and the complexity

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a graph and pp be a positive integer. A subset S⊆VS\subseteq V is called a pp-dominating set if each vertex not in SS has at least pp neighbors in SS. The pp-domination number $\g_p(G)$ is the size of a smallest pp-dominating set of GG. The pp-reinforcement number rp(G)r_p(G) is the smallest number of edges whose addition to GG results in a graph G′G' with $\g_p(G')<\g_p(G)$. In this paper, we give an original study on the pp-reinforcement, determine rp(G)r_p(G) for some graphs such as paths, cycles and complete tt-partite graphs, and establish some upper bounds of rp(G)r_p(G). In particular, we show that the decision problem on rp(G)r_p(G) is NP-hard for a general graph GG and a fixed integer p≥2p\geq 2.

preprint2012arXiv

On the Roman bondage number of a graph

A Roman dominating function on a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2}f:V\rightarrow\{0,1,2\} such that every vertex v∈Vv\in V with f(v)=0f(v)=0 has at least one neighbor u∈Vu\in V with f(u)=2f(u)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(V(G))=∑u∈V(G)f(u)f(V(G))=\sum_{u\in V(G)}f(u). The minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on a graph GG is called the Roman domination number, denoted by γR(G)γ_{R}(G). The Roman bondage number bR(G)b_{R}(G) of a graph GG with maximum degree at least two is the minimum cardinality of all sets E′⊆E(G)E'\subseteq E(G) for which γR(G−E′)>γR(G)γ_{R}(G-E')>γ_R(G). In this paper, we first show that the decision problem for determining bR(G)b_{\rm R}(G) is NP-hard even for bipartite graphs and then we establish some sharp bounds for bR(G)b_{\rm R}(G) and characterizes all graphs attaining some of these bounds.

preprint2011arXiv

Complexity of Bondage and Reinforcement

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset D⊆VD\subseteq V is a dominating set if every vertex not in DD is adjacent to a vertex in DD. A dominating set DD is called a total dominating set if every vertex in DD is adjacent to a vertex in DD. The domination (resp. total domination) number of GG is the smallest cardinality of a dominating (resp. total dominating) set of GG. The bondage (resp. total bondage) number of a nonempty graph GG is the smallest number of edges whose removal from GG results in a graph with larger domination (resp. total domination) number of GG. The reinforcement number of GG is the smallest number of edges whose addition to GG results in a graph with smaller domination number. This paper shows that the decision problems for bondage, total bondage and reinforcement are all NP-hard.

preprint2011arXiv

Roman Bondage Number of a Graph

The Roman dominating function on a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2}f: V\rightarrow\{0,1,2\} such that each vertex xx with f(x)=0f(x)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex yy with f(y)=2f(y)=2. The value f(G)=∑u∈V(G)f(u)f(G)=\sum\limits_{u\in V(G)} f(u) is called the weight of ff. The Roman domination number γR(G)γ_{\rm R}(G) is defined as the minimum weight of all Roman dominating functions. This paper defines the Roman bondage number bR(G)b_{\rm R}(G) of a nonempty graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) to be the cardinality among all sets of edges B⊆EB\subseteq E for which γR(G−B)>γR(G)γ_{\rm R}(G-B)>γ_{\rm R}(G). Some bounds are obtained for bR(G)b_{\rm R}(G), and the exact values are determined for several classes of graphs. Moreover, the decision problem for bR(G)b_{\rm R}(G) is proved to be NP-hard even for bipartite graphs.

preprint2011arXiv

Roman Bondage Numbers of Some Graphs

A Roman dominating function on a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) is a function f:V→{0,1,2}f: V\to \{0,1,2\} satisfying the condition that every vertex uu with f(u)=0f(u)=0 is adjacent to at least one vertex vv with f(v)=2f(v)=2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f(G)=∑u∈Vf(u)f(G)=\sum_{u\in V} f(u). The Roman domination number of GG is the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on GG. The Roman bondage number of a nonempty graph GG is the minimum number of edges whose removal results in a graph with the Roman domination number larger than that of GG. This paper determines the exact value of the Roman bondage numbers of two classes of graphs, complete tt-partite graphs and (n−3)(n-3)-regular graphs with order nn for any n≥5n\ge 5.

preprint2011arXiv

The bondage number of (n−3)(n-3)-regular graphs of order nn

Let G=(V,E)G=(V,E) be a graph. A subset D⊆VD\subseteq V is a dominating set if every vertex not in DD is adjacent to a vertex in DD. The domination number of GG is the smallest cardinality of a dominating set of GG. The bondage number of a nonempty graph GG is the smallest number of edges whose removal from GG results in a graph with larger domination number of GG. In this paper, we determine that the exact value of the bondage number of (n−3)(n-3)-regular graph GG of order nn is n−3n-3.

preprint2011arXiv

The Bondage Number of Mesh Networks

The bondage number b(G)b(G) of a nonempty graph GG is the smallest number of edges whose removal from GG results in a graph with domination number greater than that of GG. Denote Pn×PmP_n\times P_m be the Cartesian product of two paths PnP_n and PmP_m. This paper determines that the exact value of b(Pn×P2)b(P_n\times P_2), b(Pn×P3)b(P_n\times P_3) and b(Pn×P4)b(P_n\times P_4) for n≥2n\ge 2.

preprint2011arXiv

The total bondage number of grid graphs

The total domination number of a graph GG without isolated vertices is the minimum number of vertices that dominate all vertices in GG. The total bondage number bt(G)b_t(G) of GG is the minimum number of edges whose removal enlarges the total domination number. This paper considers grid graphs. An (n,m)(n,m)-grid graph Gn,mG_{n,m} is defined as the cartesian product of two paths PnP_n and PmP_m. This paper determines the exact values of bt(Gn,2)b_t(G_{n,2}) and bt(Gn,3)b_t(G_{n,3}), and establishes some upper bounds of bt(Gn,4)b_t(G_{n,4}).

preprint2011arXiv

Total and paired domination numbers of toroidal meshes

Let GG be a graph without isolated vertices. The total domination number of GG is the minimum number of vertices that can dominate all vertices in GG, and the paired domination number of GG is the minimum number of vertices in a dominating set whose induced subgraph contains a perfect matching. This paper determines the total domination number and the paired domination number of the toroidal meshes, i.e., the Cartesian product of two cycles CnC_n and CmC_m for any n≥3n\ge 3 and m∈{3,4}m\in\{3,4\}, and gives some upper bounds for n,m≥5n, m\ge 5.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.