BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Frits C. R. Spieksma

Frits C. R. Spieksma contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Science and Game TheoryData Structures and Algorithmsmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Rejection-proof Kidney Exchange Mechanisms

Kidney exchange programs (KEPs) form an innovative approach to increasing the donor pool through allowing the participation of renal patients together with a willing but incompatible donor. The aim of a KEP is to identify groups of incompatible donor-recipient pairs that could exchange donors leading to feasible transplants. As the size of a kidney exchange grows, a larger proportion of participants can be transplanted. Collaboration between multiple transplant centers, by merging their separate kidney exchange pools is thus desirable. As each transplant center has its own interest to provide the best care to its own patients, collaboration requires balancing individual and common objectives. We consider a class of algorithmic mechanisms for multi-center kidney exchange programs we call rejection-proof mechanisms. Such mechanisms propose solutions with the property that no player wishes to unilaterally deviate. We provide a mechanism optimizing social value under this restriction, though the underlying optimization problem is Sigma-2-p-Hard. We also describe a computationally easier but sub-optimal alternative. Experiments show that rejection-proofness can be achieved at limited cost compared to optimal solutions for regular kidney exchange. Computationally, we provide algorithms to compute optimal rejection-proof solutions for small and medium instance sizes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Approximation algorithms for car-sharing problems

We consider several variants of a car-sharing problem. Given are a number of requests each consisting of a pick-up location and a drop-off location, a number of cars, and nonnegative, symmetric travel times that satisfy the triangle inequality. Each request needs to be served by a car, which means that a car must first visit the pick-up location of the request, and then visit the drop-off location of the request. Each car can serve two requests. One problem is to serve all requests with the minimum total travel time (called $\CS_{sum}$), and the other problem is to serve all requests with the minimum total latency (called $\CS_{lat}$). We also study the special case where the pick-up and drop-off location of a request coincide. We propose two basic algorithms, called the match and assign algorithm and the transportation algorithm. We show that the best of the resulting two solutions is a $ 2$-approximation for $\CS_{sum}$ (and a $7/5$-approximation for its special case), and a $5/3 $-approximation for $\CS_{lat}$ (and a $3/2$-approximation for its special case); these ratios are better than the ratios of the individual algorithms. Finally, we indicate how our algorithms can be applied to more general settings where each car can serve more than two requests, or where cars have distinct speeds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Stackelberg Kidney Exchange Problem is $Σ_2^p$-complete

We introduce the Stackelberg kidney exchange problem. In this problem, an agent (e.g. a hospital or a national organization) has control over a number of incompatible patient-donor pairs whose patients are in need of a transplant. The agent has the opportunity to join a collaborative effort which aims to increase the maximum total number of transplants that can be realized. However, the individual agent is only interested in maximizing the number of transplants within the set of patients under its control. Then, the question becomes which patients to submit to the collaborative effort. We show that, whenever we allow exchanges involving at most a fixed number $K \ge 3$ pairs, answering this question is $Σ_2^p$-complete. However, when we restrict ourselves to pairwise exchanges only, the problem becomes solvable in polynomial time

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access