Source author record

Friedrich Jegerlehner

Friedrich Jegerlehner appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

BHLS$_2$ Upgrade : $τ$ spectra, muon HVP and the [$π^0,~η,~η^\prime$] System

The generic Hidden Local Symmetry (HLS) model has given rise to the BHLS$_2$ variant which introduces symmetry breaking in the vector meson sector; the central mechanism is a modification of the covariant derivative at the root of the HLS approach. However, the description of the Belle $τ$ dipion spectra is not satisfactory whereas the dealing with its annihilation sector ($e^+ e^- \rightarrow π^+ π^-/π^+ π^-π^0/ π^0 γ/ηγ/K^+ K^-/K_L K_S$) is optimum. This issue is solved by an additional breaking term allowing to include the $[π^0,η,η^\prime]$ system. This extension of the usual 't~Hooft determinant term only affects the BHLS$_2$ kinetic energy term. One obtains a fair account for the $τ$ dipion spectra as well as for the annihilation channels. The Belle dipion spectrum provides evidence for a violation of CVC in the $τ$ lepton decay; this evidence is strengthened by imposing the conditions $<0|J_μ^q |[q^\prime \overline{q^\prime}](p)>=ip_μf_q δ_{q q^\prime }, \{ [q \overline{q}], q=u,d,s\}$ on BHLS$_2$ axial current matrix elements. BHLS$_2$ is found to recover the usual (completed) formulae for the [$π^0,~η,~η^\prime$] mixing parameters and the global fits return mixing parameter values in agreement with expectations and better uncertainties. Updating the muon HVP, one argues that the strong tension between the KLOE and BaBar pion form factors imposes to provide two solutions : $a_μ^{HVP-LO}({\rm KLOE})=687.31 \pm 2.93$ and $a_μ^{HVP-LO}({\rm BaBar})=692.36 \pm 2.95$, in units of $10^{-10}$, rather than some combination of these. Taking into account common systematics, their differences with the experimental BNL-FNAL average value exhibit significances $> 5.4σ$ (KLOE) and $> 4.1σ$ (BaBar) with fit probabilities favoring the former.