Source author record

Fredrik Roos

Fredrik Roos appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Optimal Freewheeling Control of a Heavy-Duty Vehicle Using Mixed Integer Quadratic Programming

Improving the powertrain control of heavy-duty vehicles can be an efficient way to reduce the fuel consumption and thereby reduce both the operating cost and the environmental impact. One way of doing so is by using information about the upcoming driving conditions, known as look-ahead information, in order to coast with a gear engaged or to use freewheeling. Controllers using such techniques today mainly exist for vehicles in highway driving. This paper therefore targets how such control can be applied to vehicles with more variations in their velocity, such as distribution vehicles. The driving mission of such a vehicle is here formulated as an optimal control problem. The control variables are the tractive force, the braking force, and a Boolean variable representing closed or open powertrain. The problem is solved by a Model Predictive Controller, which at each iteration solves a Mixed Integer Quadratic Program. The fuel consumption is compared for four different control policies: a benchmark following the reference of the driving cycle, look-ahead control without freewheeling, freewheeling with the engine idling, and freewheeling with the engine turned off. Simulations on a driving cycle typically used for testing distribution vehicles show the potential of saving 10%, 16%, and 20\% respectively for the control policies compared with the benchmark, in all cases without increasing the trip time.