BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Frank Schaarschmidt

Frank Schaarschmidt contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A modified Armitage test for more than a linear trend on proportions

The Armitage test for linear trend in proportions can be modified using the multiple marginal model approach for three regression models with arithmetic, ordinal and logarithmic dose scores simultaneously, to be powerful against a wide range of possible dose response relationships. Moreover, it can be used for particular designs in the generalized linear (mixed) model for the three common effect sizes odds ratio, risk ratio and risk difference. The related R package tukeytrend allows simple generalizations, e.g. the analysis 2-by-k table data with a possible plateau shape or analysing overdispersed proportions. The evaluation of further real data examples are available in a vignette to that R package.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A Tukey type trend test for repeated carcinogenicity bioassays, motivated by multiple glyphosate studies

In the last two decades, significant methodological progress to the simultaneous inference of simple and complex randomized designs, particularly proportions as endpoints, occurred. This includes: i) the new Tukey trend test approach, ii) multiple contrast tests for binomial proportions, iii) multiple contrast tests for poly-k estimates, and Add-1 approximation for one-sided inference. This report focus on a new Tukey type trend test to evaluate repeated long-term carcinogenicity bioassays which was motivated by multiple glyphosate studies. Notice, it is not the aim here to contribute to the evaluation of Glyphosate and its controversies. By means of the CRAN-packages tukeytrend, MCPAN, multcomp the real data analysis is straightforward possible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A versatile trend test for the evaluation of tumor incidences in long-term carcinogenicity bioassays

For the evaluation of carcinogenicity bioassays a new trend test is proposed which is based on a maximum of arithmetic, ordinal, and logarithmic regression scores as well as the Williams-type contrasts for either crude proportions or more appropriate poly3-estimates for the tumor-by-time relationships. This test provides an almost appropriate power for most shapes of dose-response relationships (including for possible downturn effect at high(er) dose(s)), common signs of significance (p-value, confidence limits) and the information on the probable shape. Related software is easily available within the CRAN-packages tukeytrend, MCPAN, multcomp.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Model-based simultaneous inference for multiple subgroups and multiple endpoints

Various methodological options exist on evaluating differences in both subgroups and the overall population. Most desirable is the simultaneous study of multiple endpoints in several populations. We investigate a newer method using multiple marginal models (mmm) which allows flexible handling of multiple endpoints, including continuous, binary or time-to-event data. This paper explores the performance of mmm in contrast to the standard Bonferroni approach via simulation. Mainly these methods are compared on the basis of their familywise error rate and power under different scenarios, varying in sample size and standard deviation. Additionally, it is shown that the method can deal with overlapping subgroup definitions and different combinations of endpoints may be assumed. The reanalysis of a clinical example shows a practical application.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access