Researcher profile

Francois Nicolas

Francois Nicolas contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Tighter Undecidability Bounds for Matrix Mortality, Zero-in-the-Corner Problems, and More

We study the decidability of three well-known problems related to integer matrix multiplication: Mortality (M), Zero in the Left-Upper Corner (Z), and Zero in the Right-Upper Corner (R). Let d and k be positive integers. Define M(k, d x d) as the following special case of the Mortality problem: given a set X of d -by-d integer matrices such that the cardinality of X is not greater than k, decide whether the d-by-d zero matrix belongs to X^+, where X^+ denotes the closure of X under the usual matrix multiplication. In the same way, define the Z(k, d x d) problem as: given an instance X of M(k, d x d) (the instances of Z(k, d x d) are the same as those of M(k, d x d)), decide whether at least one matrix in X^+ has a zero in the left-upper corner. Define R(k, d x d) as the variant of Z(k, d x d) where "left-upper corner" is replaced with "right-upper corner". In the paper, we prove that M(6, 3 x 3), M(4, 5 x 5), M(3, 9 x 9), M(2, 15 x 15), Z(5, 3 x 3), Z(3, 5 x 5), Z(2, 9 x 9), R(6, 3 x 3), R(5, 4 x 4), and R(3, 6 x 6) are undecidable. The previous best comparable results were the undecidabilities of M(7, 3 x 3), M(3, 13 x 13), M(2, 21 x 21), Z(7, 3 x 3), Z(2, 13 x 13), R(7, 3 x 3), and R(2, 10 x 10).

preprint2012arXiv

On the decidability of semigroup freeness

This paper deals with the decidability of semigroup freeness. More precisely, the freeness problem over a semigroup S is defined as: given a finite subset X of S, decide whether each element of S has at most one factorization over X. To date, the decidabilities of two freeness problems have been closely examined. In 1953, Sardinas and Patterson proposed a now famous algorithm for the freeness problem over the free monoid. In 1991, Klarner, Birget and Satterfield proved the undecidability of the freeness problem over three-by-three integer matrices. Both results led to the publication of many subsequent papers. The aim of the present paper is three-fold: (i) to present general results concerning freeness problems, (ii) to study the decidability of freeness problems over various particular semigroups (special attention is devoted to multiplicative matrix semigroups), and (iii) to propose precise, challenging open questions in order to promote the study of the topic.

preprint2012arXiv

Various complexity results for computational mass spectrometry problems

Define Minimum Soapy Union (MinSU) as the following optimization problem: given a $k$-tuple $(X_1, X_2,..., X_k)$ of finite integer sets, find a $k$-tuple $(t_1, t_2,..., t_k)$ of integers that minimizes the cardinality of $(X_1 + t_1) \cup (X_2 + t_2) \cup ... \cup (X_n + t_k)$. We show that MinSU is NP-complete, APX-hard, and polynomial for fixed $k$. MinSU appears naturally in the context of protein shotgun sequencing: Here, the protein is cleaved into short and overlapping peptides, which are then analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. To improve the quality of such spectra, one then asks for the mass of the unknown prefix (the shift) of the spectrum, such that the resulting shifted spectra show a maximum agreement. For real-world data the problem is even more complicated than our definition of MinSU; but our intractability results clearly indicate that it is unlikely to find a polynomial time algorithm for shotgun protein sequencing.

preprint2011arXiv

Intractability of the Minimum-Flip Supertree problem and its variants

Computing supertrees is a central problem in phylogenetics. The supertree method that is by far the most widely used today was introduced in 1992 and is called Matrix Representation with Parsimony analysis (MRP). Matrix Representation using Flipping (MRF)}, which was introduced in 2002, is an interesting variant of MRP: MRF is arguably more relevant that MRP and various efficient implementations of MRF have been presented. From a theoretical point of view, implementing MRF or MRP is solving NP-hard optimization problems. The aim of this paper is to study the approximability and the fixed-parameter tractability of the optimization problem corresponding to MRF, namely Minimum-Flip Supertree. We prove strongly negative results.