Researcher profile

Francesca Biagini

Francesca Biagini contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Extended Reduced-Form Framework for Non-Life Insurance

In this paper we propose a general framework for modeling an insurance liability cash flow in continuous time, by generalizing the reduced-form framework for credit risk and life insurance. In particular, we assume a nontrivial dependence structure between the reference filtration and the insurance internal filtration. We apply these results for pricing and hedging non-life insurance liabilities in hybrid financial and insurance markets, while taking into account the role of inflation under the benchmarked risk-minimization approach. This framework offers at the same time a general and flexible structure, and an explicit and treatable pricing-hedging formula.

preprint2022arXiv

Non-linear Affine Processes with Jumps

We present a probabilistic construction of $\mathbb{R}^d$-valued non-linear affine processes with jumps. Given a set $Θ$ of affine parameters, we define a family of sublinear expectations on the Skorokhod space under which the canonical process $X$ is a (sublinear) Markov process with a non-linear generator. This yields a tractable model for Knightian uncertainty for which the sublinear expectation of a Markovian functional can be calculated via a partial integro-differential equation.

preprint2020arXiv

Optional projection under equivalent local martingale measures

Motivation for this paper is to understand the impact of information on asset price bubbles and perceived arbitrage opportunities. This boils down to study optional projections of $\mathbb{G}$-adapted strict local martingales into a smaller filtration $\mathbb{F}$ under equivalent martingale measures. We give some general results as well as analyze in details two specific examples given by the inverse three dimensional Bessel process and a class of stochastic volatility models.

preprint2020arXiv

Reduced-form setting under model uncertainty with non-linear affine processes

In this paper we extend the reduced-form setting under model uncertainty introduced in [5] to include intensities following an affine process under parameter uncertainty, as defined in [15]. This framework allows to introduce a longevity bond under model uncertainty in a consistent way with the classical case under one prior, and to compute its valuation numerically. Moreover, we are able to price a contingent claim with the sublinear conditional operator such that the extended market is still arbitrage-free in the sense of "No Arbitrage of the first kind" as in [6].

preprint2020arXiv

Systemic Optimal Risk Transfer Equilibrium

We propose a novel concept of a Systemic Optimal Risk Transfer Equilibrium (SORTE), which is inspired by the Bühlmann's classical notion of an Equilibrium Risk Exchange. We provide sufficient general assumptions that guarantee existence, uniqueness, and Pareto optimality of such a SORTE. In both the Bühlmann and the SORTE definition, each agent is behaving rationally by maximizing his/her expected utility given a budget constraint. The two approaches differ by the budget constraints. In Bühlmann's definition the vector that assigns the budget constraint is given a priori. On the contrary, in the SORTE approach, the vector that assigns the budget constraint is endogenously determined by solving a systemic utility maximization. SORTE gives priority to the systemic aspects of the problem, in order to optimize the overall systemic performance, rather than to individual rationality.