BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Frances Cooper

Frances Cooper contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A 3/2-approximation algorithm for the Student-Project Allocation problem

The Student-Project Allocation problem with lecturer preferences over Students (SPA-S) comprises three sets of agents, namely students, projects and lecturers, where students have preferences over projects and lecturers have preferences over students. In this scenario we seek a stable matching, that is, an assignment of students to projects such that there is no student and lecturer who have an incentive to deviate from their assignee/s. We study SPA-ST, the extension of SPA-S in which the preference lists of students and lecturers need not be strictly ordered, and may contain ties. In this scenario, stable matchings may be of different sizes, and it is known that MAX SPA-ST, the problem of finding a maximum stable matching in SPA-ST, is NP-hard. We present a linear-time 3/2-approximation algorithm for MAX SPA-ST and an Integer Programming (IP) model to solve MAX SPA-ST optimally. We compare the approximation algorithm with the IP model experimentally using randomly-generated data. We find that the performance of the approximation algorithm easily surpassed the 3/2 bound, constructing a stable matching within 92% of optimal in all cases, with the percentage being far higher for many instances.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Algorithms for new types of fair stable matchings

We study the problem of finding "fair" stable matchings in the Stable Marriage problem with Incomplete lists (SMI). For an instance $I$ of SMI there may be many stable matchings, providing significantly different outcomes for the sets of men and women. We introduce two new notions of fairness in SMI. Firstly, a regret-equal stable matching minimises the difference in ranks of a worst-off man and a worst-off woman, among all stable matchings. Secondly, a min-regret sum stable matching minimises the sum of ranks of a worst-off man and a worst-off woman, among all stable matchings. We present two new efficient algorithms to find stable matchings of these types. Firstly, the Regret-Equal Degree Iteration Algorithm finds a regret-equal stable matching in $O(d_0 nm)$ time, where $d_0$ is the absolute difference in ranks between a worst-off man and a worst-off woman in the man-optimal stable matching, $n$ is the number of men or women, and $m$ is the total length of all preference lists. Secondly, the Min-Regret Sum Algorithm finds a min-regret sum stable matching in $O(d_s m)$ time, where $d_s$ is the difference in the ranks between a worst-off man in each of the woman-optimal and man-optimal stable matchings. Experiments to compare several types of fair optimal stable matchings were conducted and show that the Regret-Equal Degree Iteration Algorithm produces matchings that are competitive with respect to other fairness objectives. On the other hand, existing types of "fair" stable matchings did not provide as close an approximation to regret-equal stable matchings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Two-sided profile-based optimality in the stable marriage problem

We study the problem of finding "fair" stable matchings in the Stable Marriage problem with Incomplete lists (SMI). In particular, we seek stable matchings that are optimal with respect to profile, which is a vector that indicates the number of agents who have their first-, second-, third-choice partner, etc. In a rank maximal stable matching, the maximum number of agents have their first-choice partner, and subject to this, the maximum number of agents have their second-choice partner, etc., whilst in a generous stable matching $M$, the minimum number of agents have their $d$th-choice partner, and subject to this, the minimum number of agents have their $(d-1)$th-choice partner, etc., where $d$ is the maximum rank of an agent's partner in $M$. Irving et al. [18] presented an $O(nm^2\log n)$ algorithm for finding a rank-maximal stable matching, which can be adapted easily to the generous stable matching case, where $n$ is the number of men / women and $m$ is the number of acceptable man-woman pairs. An $O(n^{0.5}m^{1.5})$ algorithm for the rank-maximal stable matching problem was later given by Feder [7]. However these approaches involve the use of weights that are in general exponential in $n$. In this paper we present an $O(nm^2\log n)$ algorithm for finding a rank-maximal stable matching using a vector-based approach that involves weights that are polynomially-bounded in $n$. We conduct an empirical evaluation, and show how this approach has a far reduced memory requirement (an estimated $100$-fold improvement for instances with $100, 000$ men or women) when compared to Irving et al.'s algorithm above. Additionally, we show how to adapt our algorithm for the generous case. Finally, we examine the complexity of the problem of finding profile-based optimal stable matchings in the Stable Roommates problem (SR).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access