Comment on "Braneworld Effective Field Theories -- Holography, Consistency and Conformal Effects"
Several arguments given in arXiv:1912.12316 suggest that braneworld effective models with fields strictly localized on $δ$-like branes cannot be UV-completed by a fundamental theory including gravity, i.e. they belong to the Swampland. It is concluded that one should instead only consider models with quasilocalized zero-modes of higher-dimensional fields. In this comment, the arguments are critically reviewed, and various loopholes are proposed. Beyond that, the main point that is discussed is the notion of effective brane form factors, which are required when the singular behavior of the branes is softened in the UV-completion.