Source author record

Fintan Costello

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.NT Applications Artificial Intelligence physics.data-an Populations and Evolution

Catalog footprint

Research overview

5works

5topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2022arXiv

Homeostatic behavioural response to COVID-19 infections returns R to a set-point of 1

One clear aspect of behaviour in the COVID-19 pandemic has been people's focus on, and response to, reported or observed infection numbers in their community. We describe a simple model of infectious disease spread in a pandemic situation where people's behaviour is influenced by the current risk of infection and where this behavioural response acts homeostatically to return infection risk to a certain preferred level. This model predicts that the reproduction rate $R$ will be centered around a median value of 1, and that a related measure of relative change in the number of new infections will follow the standard Cauchy distribution. Analysis of worldwide COVID-19 data shows that the estimated reproduction rate has a median of 1, and that this measure of relative change calculated from reported numbers of new infections closely follows the standard Cauchy distribution at both an overall and an individual country level.

preprint2014arXiv

Surprisingly Rational: Probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment

The systematic biases seen in people's probability judgments are typically taken as evidence that people do not reason about probability using the rules of probability theory, but instead use heuristics which sometimes yield reasonable judgments and sometimes systematic biases. This view has had a major impact in economics, law, medicine, and other fields; indeed, the idea that people cannot reason with probabilities has become a widespread truism. We present a simple alternative to this view, where people reason about probability according to probability theory but are subject to random variation or noise in the reasoning process. In this account the effect of noise is cancelled for some probabilistic expressions: analysing data from two experiments we find that, for these expressions, people's probability judgments are strikingly close to those required by probability theory. For other expressions this account produces systematic deviations in probability estimates. These deviations explain four reliable biases in human probabilistic reasoning (conservatism, subadditivity, conjunction and disjunction fallacies). These results suggest that people's probability judgments embody the rules of probability theory, and that biases in those judgments are due to the effects of random noise.

preprint2013arXiv

A short note on Jacobsthal's function

The function g(n) represents the smallest number Q such that every sequence of Q consecutive integers contains an integer coprime to n. We give a new and explicit upper bound on this function.

preprint2012arXiv

A computational upper bound on Jacobsthal's function

The function h(k) represents the smallest number m such that every sequence of m consecutive integers contains an integer coprime to the first k primes. We give a new computational method for calculating strong upper bounds on h(k).

preprint2012arXiv

Jacobsthal's function and a generalisation of Euler's totient

Jacobsthal's function h(k) represents the smallest number m such that every sequence of m consecutive integers contains an integer coprime to P_k, the product of the first k primes. The best known bound on h(k) is h(k) < C (k ln k)^2 for some unknown constant C, due to Iwaniec. We use a generalisation of Euler's totient function to give a stronger bound on h(k).

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.