Researcher profile

Felix I. Stamm

Felix I. Stamm contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Faster optimal univariate microgaggregation

Microaggregation is a method to coarsen a dataset, by optimally clustering data points in groups of at least $k$ points, thereby providing a $k$-anonymity type disclosure guarantee for each point in the dataset. Previous algorithms for univariate microaggregation had a $O(k n)$ time complexity. By rephrasing microaggregation as an instance of the concave least weight subsequence problem, in this work we provide improved algorithms that provide an optimal univariate microaggregation on sorted data in $O(n)$ time and space. We further show that our algorithms work not only for sum of squares cost functions, as typically considered, but seamlessly extend to many other cost functions used for univariate microaggregation tasks. In experiments we show that the presented algorithms lead to real world performance improvements.

preprint2021arXiv

Simulating systematic bias in attributed social networks and its effect on rankings of minority nodes

Network analysis provides powerful tools to learn about a variety of social systems. However, most analyses implicitly assume that the considered relational data is error-free, reliable and accurately reflects the system to be analysed. Especially if the network consists of multiple groups, this assumption conflicts with a range of systematic biases, measurement errors and other inaccuracies that are well documented in the literature. To investigate the effects of such errors we introduce a framework for simulating systematic bias in attributed networks. Our framework enables us to model erroneous edge observations that are driven by external node attributes or errors arising from the (hidden) network structure itself. We exemplify how systematic inaccuracies distort conclusions drawn from network analyses on the network analysis task of minority representations in degree-based rankings. By analysing synthetic and real networks with varying homophily levels and group sizes, we find that introducing systematic edge errors can result both in a strongly increased or decreased ranking of the minority. The observed effect depends both on the type of edge error considered and level of homophily in the system. We thus conclude that the implications of systematic bias in edge data depend on an interplay between network topology and type of systematic error. This emphasises the need for an error model framework as developed here, which provides a first step towards studying the effects of systematic edge-uncertainty for various network analysis tasks.