BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Felix Hommelsheim

Felix Hommelsheim contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematicsmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the Complexity of the Bilevel Minimum Spanning Tree Problem

We consider the bilevel minimum spanning tree (BMST) problem where the leader and the follower choose a spanning tree together, according to different objective functions. By showing that this problem is NP-hard in general, we answer an open question stated in by Shi et al. We prove that BMST remains hard even in the special case where the follower only controls a matching. Moreover, by a polynomial reduction from the vertex-disjoint Steiner trees problem, we give some evidence that BMST might even remain hard in case the follower controls only few edges. On the positive side, we present a polynomial-time $(|V|-1)$-approximation algorithm for BMST, where $|V|$ is the number of vertices in the input graph. Moreover, considering the number of edges controlled by the follower as parameter, we show that 2-approximating BMST is fixed-parameter tractable and that, in case of uniform costs on leader's edges, even solving BMST exactly is fixed-parameter tractable. We finally consider bottleneck variants of BMST and settle the complexity landscape of all combinations of sum or bottleneck objective functions for the leader and follower, for the optimistic as well as the pessimistic setting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fault-Tolerant Edge-Disjoint Paths -- Beyond Uniform Faults

The overwhelming majority of survivable (fault-tolerant) network design models assume a uniform fault model. Such a model assumes that every subset of the network resources (edges or vertices) of a given cardinality $k$ may fail. While this approach yields problems with clean combinatorial structure and good algorithms, it often fails to capture the true nature of the scenario set coming from applications. One natural refinement of the uniform model is obtained by partitioning the set of resources into vulnerable and safe resources. The scenario set contains every subset of at most $k$ faulty resources. This work studies the Fault-Tolerant Path (FTP) problem, the counterpart of the Shortest Path problem in this fault model and the Fault-Tolerant Flow problem (FTF), the counterpart of the $\ell$-disjoint Shortest $s$-$t$ Path problem. We present complexity results alongside exact and approximation algorithms for both models. We emphasize the vast increase in the complexity of the problem with respect to the uniform analogue, the Edge-Disjoint Paths problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Flexible Graph Connectivity: Approximating Network Design Problems Between 1- and 2-connectivity

Graph connectivity and network design problems are among the most fundamental problems in combinatorial optimization. The minimum spanning tree problem, the two edge-connected spanning subgraph problem (2-ECSS) and the tree augmentation problem (TAP) are all examples of fundamental well-studied network design tasks that postulate different initial states of the network and different assumptions on the reliability of network components. In this paper we motivate and study \emph{Flexible Graph Connectivity} (FGC), a problem that mixes together both the modeling power and the complexities of all aforementioned problems and more. In a nutshell, FGC asks to design a connected network, while allowing to specify different reliability levels for individual edges. While this non-uniform nature of the problem makes it appealing from the modeling perspective, it also renders most existing algorithmic tools for dealing with network design problems unfit for approximating FGC. In this paper we develop a general algorithmic approach for approximating FGC that yields approximation algorithms with ratios that are very close to the best known bounds for many special cases, such as 2-ECSS and TAP. Our algorithm and analysis combine various techniques including a weight-scaling algorithm, a charging argument that uses a variant of exchange bijections between spanning trees and a factor revealing min-max-min optimization problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access