Researcher profile

Fedde Benedictus

Fedde Benedictus contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Does Time exist? -- catchphrases and concepts

This paper lends perspective to the media catchphrase that <time does not exist>. To show how phrases such as this should be interpreted, we formulate some of the most important questions that arise in discussions about time in physics. We start by analyzing Newton&#39;s objective view on time and explain how entropy gives it a direction. After that, we discuss how relativity distances us from Newton&#39;s views, while quantum theory brings us closer to the Newtonian view. The arguments are presented in such a way that they can be followed and checked by anyone who studies the theories involved - be they undergraduate physics students or otherwise.

preprint2015arXiv

Probability, Logic and Objectivity - The concept of probability of Carl Stumpf

We will show that Carl Stumpf&#39;s interpretation of the concept of probability is best understood as that of an objective Bayesian. First we analyse Stumpf&#39;s work in relation to that of his contemporary Johannes von Kries, and after that we will discuss various ways in which Stumpf&#39;s probability-concept has been construed. By showing that the construals of Stumpf&#39;s account by Hans Reichenbach, Richard von Mises and Andreas Kamlah are unfair - and at some points incorrect - we uncover the aspects that are essential to Stumpf&#39;s probability interpretation.

preprint2013arXiv

Reichenbach&#39;s Transcendental Probability

The aim of this article is twofold. First, we shall review and analyse the Neo-Kantian justification for the application of probabilistic concepts in physics that was defended by Hans Reichenbach early in his career, notably in his dissertation of 1916. At first sight this Kantian approach seems to contrast sharply with Reichenbach&#39;s later logical positivist, frequentist viewpoint. But, and this is our second goal, we shall attempt to show that there is an underlying continuity in Reichenbach&#39;s thought: typical features of his early Kantian conceptions can still be recognized in his later work.