BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Fangting Li

Fangting Li contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Cell BehaviorMolecular NetworksPopulations and Evolution

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Model-based cellular kinetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: different immune response modes and treatment strategies

Increasing number in global COVID-19 cases demands for mathematical model to analyze the interaction between the virus dynamics and the response of innate and adaptive immunity. Here, based on the assumption of a weak and delayed response of the innate and adaptive immunity in SARS-CoV-2 infection, we constructed a mathematical model to describe the dynamic processes of immune system. Integrating theoretical results with clinical COVID-19 patients' data, we classified the COVID-19 development processes into three typical modes of immune responses, correlated with the clinical classification of mild & moderate, severe and critical patients. We found that the immune efficacy (the ability of host to clear virus and kill infected cells) and the lymphocyte supply (the abundance and pool of naïve T and B cell) play important roles in the dynamic process and determine the clinical outcome, especially for the severe and critical patients. Furthermore, we put forward possible treatment strategies for the three typical modes of immune response. We hope our results can help to understand the dynamical mechanism of the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to be useful for the treatment strategies and vaccine design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Critical slowing down and attractive manifold: a mechanism for dynamic robustness in yeast cell-cycle process

The biological processes that execute complex multiple functions, such as cell cycle, must ensure the order of sequential events and keep the dynamic robustness against various fluctuations. Here, we examine the dynamic mechanism and the fundamental structure to achieve these properties in the cell-cycle process of budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that the budding yeast cell-cycle process behaves like an excitable system containing three well-coupled saddle-node bifurcations to execute DNA replication and mitosis events. The yeast cell-cycle regulatory network can be separated into G1/S phase module, early M module and late M phase module, where the positive feedbacks in each module and the interactions among the modules play important role. If the cell-cycle process operates near the critical points of the saddle-node bifurcations, there is a critical slowing down or ghost effect. This can provide the cell-cycle process with a sufficient duration for each event and an attractive manifold for the state checking of the completion of DNA replication and mitosis; moreover, the fluctuation in the early module/event is forbidden to transmit to the latter module/event. Our results suggest both a fundamental structure of cell-cycle regulatory network and a hint for the evolution of eukaryotic cell-cycle processes, from the dynamic checking mechanism to the molecule checkpoint pathway.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access