BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Fabrizia Mealli

Fabrizia Mealli appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
MethodologyApplicationsecon.EMstat.OT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

10works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Bayesian principal stratification with longitudinal data and truncation by death

In many causal studies, outcomes are censored by death, in the sense that they are neither observed nor defined for units who die. In such studies, the focus is usually on the stratum of always survivors up to a single fixed time s. Building on a recent strand of the literature, we propose an extended framework for the analysis of longitudinal studies, where units can die at different time points, and the main endpoints are observed and well defined only up to the death time. We develop a Bayesian longitudinal principal stratification framework, where units are cross classified according to the longitudinal death status. Under this framework, the focus is on causal effects for the principal strata of units that would be alive up to a time point s irrespective of their treatment assignment, where these strata may vary as a function of s. We can get precious insights into the effects of treatment by inspecting the distribution of baseline characteristics within each longitudinal principal stratum, and by investigating the time trend of both principal stratum membership and survivor-average causal effects. We illustrate our approach for the analysis of a longitudinal observational study aimed to assess, under the assumption of strong ignorability of treatment assignment, the causal effects of a policy promoting start ups on firms survival and hiring policy, where firms hiring status is censored by death.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Bipartite Interference and Air Pollution Transport: Estimating Health Effects of Power Plant Interventions

Evaluating air quality interventions is confronted with the challenge of interference since interventions at a particular pollution source likely impact air quality and health at distant locations and air quality and health at any given location are likely impacted by interventions at many sources. The structure of interference in this context is dictated by complex atmospheric processes governing how pollution emitted from a particular source is transformed and transported across space, and can be cast with a bipartite structure reflecting the two distinct types of units: 1) interventional units on which treatments are applied or withheld to change pollution emissions; and 2) outcome units on which outcomes of primary interest are measured. We propose new estimands for bipartite causal inference with interference that construe two components of treatment: a "key-associated" (or "individual") treatment and an "upwind" (or "neighborhood") treatment. Estimation is carried out using a semi-parametric adjustment approach based on joint propensity scores. A reduced-complexity atmospheric model is deployed to characterize the structure of the interference network by modeling the movement of air parcels through time and space. The new methods are deployed to evaluate the effectiveness of installing flue-gas desulfurization scrubbers on 472 coal-burning power plants (the interventional units) in reducing Medicare hospitalizations among 21,577,552 Medicare beneficiaries residing across 25,553 ZIP codes in the United States (the outcome units).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Exploiting network information to disentangle spillover effects in a field experiment on teens' museum attendance

A key element in the education of youths is their sensitization to historical and artistic heritage. We analyze a field experiment conducted in Florence (Italy) to assess how appropriate incentives assigned to high-school classes may induce teens to visit museums in their free time. Non-compliance and spillover effects make the impact evaluation of this clustered encouragement design challenging. We propose to blend principal stratification and causal mediation, by defining sub-populations of units according to their compliance behavior and using the information on their friendship networks as mediator. We formally define principal natural direct and indirect effects and principal controlled direct and spillover effects, and use them to disentangle spillovers from other causal channels. We adopt a Bayesian approach for inference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Posterior Predictive P-values with Fisher Randomization Tests in Noncompliance Settings: Test Statistics vs Discrepancy Variables

In randomized experiments with noncompliance, tests may focus on compliers rather than on the overall sample. Rubin (1998) put forth such a method, and argued that testing for the complier average causal effect and averaging permutation based p-values over the posterior distribution of the compliance status could increase power, as compared to general intent-to-treat tests. The general scheme is to repeatedly do a two-step process of imputing missing compliance statuses and conducting a permutation test with the completed data. In this paper, we explore this idea further, comparing the use of discrepancy measures, which depend on unknown but imputed parameters, to classical test statistics and exploring different approaches for imputing the unknown compliance statuses. We also examine consequences of model misspecification in the imputation step, and discuss to what extent this additional modeling undercuts the permutation test's model independence. We find that, especially for discrepancy measures, modeling choices can impact both power and validity. In particular, imputing missing compliance statuses assuming the null can radically reduce power, but not doing so can jeopardize validity. Fortunately, covariates predictive of compliance status can mitigate these results. Finally, we compare this overall approach to Bayesian model-based tests, that is tests that are directly derived from posterior credible intervals, under both correct and incorrect model specification. We find that adding the permutation step in an otherwise Bayesian approach improves robustness to model specification without substantial loss of power.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Potential outcome approach to causal inference in assessing the short term impact of air pollution on mortality

The opportunity to assess short term impact of air pollution relies on the causal interpretation of the exposure-outcome association, but up to now few studies explicitly faced this issue within a causal inference framework. In this paper, we reformulated the problem of assessing the short term impact of air pollution on health using the potential outcome approach to causal inference. We focused on the impact of high daily levels of PM10 on mortality within two days from the exposure in the metropolitan area of Milan (Italy), during the period 2003-2006. After defining the number of attributable deaths in terms of difference between potential outcomes, we used the estimated propensity score to match each high exposure-day with a day with similar background characteristics but lower PM10 level. Then, we estimated the impact by comparing mortality between matched days. We found that during the study period daily exposures larger than 40 microgram per cubic meter were responsible of 1079 deaths (116; 2042). The impact was more evident among the elderly than in the younger classes of age. The propensity score matching turned out to be an appealing method to assess historical impacts in this field.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Principal Score Methods: Assumptions and Extensions

Researchers addressing post-treatment complications in randomized trials often turn to principal stratification to define relevant assumptions and quantities of interest. One approach for estimating causal effects in this framework is to use methods based on the "principal score," typically assuming that stratum membership is as-good-as-randomly assigned given a set of covariates. In this paper, we clarify the key assumption in this context, known as Principal Ignorability, and argue that versions of this assumption are quite strong in practice. We describe different estimation approaches and demonstrate that weighting-based methods are generally preferable to subgroup-based approaches that discretize the principal score. We then extend these ideas to the case of two-sided noncompliance and propose a natural framework for combining Principal Ignorability with exclusion restrictions and other assumptions. Finally, we apply these ideas to the Head Start Impact Study, a large-scale randomized evaluation of the Head Start program. Overall, we argue that, while principal score methods are useful tools, applied researchers should fully understand the relevant assumptions when using them in practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Evaluating the Causal Effect of University Grants on Student Dropout: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design Using Principal Stratification

Regression discontinuity (RD) designs are often interpreted as local randomized experiments: a RD design can be considered as a randomized experiment for units with a realized value of a so-called forcing variable falling around a pre-fixed threshold. Motivated by the evaluation of Italian university grants, we consider a fuzzy RD design where the receipt of the treatment is based on both eligibility criteria and a voluntary application status. Resting on the fact that grant application and grant receipt statuses are post-assignment (post-eligibility) intermediate variables, we use the principal stratification framework to define causal estimands within the Rubin Causal Model. We propose a probabilistic formulation of the assignment mechanism underlying RD designs, by re-formulating the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA) and making an explicit local overlap assumption for a subpopulation around the threshold. A local randomization assumption is invoked instead of more standard continuity assumptions. We also develop a model-based Bayesian approach to select the target subpopulation(s) with adjustment for multiple comparisons, and to draw inference for the target causal estimands in this framework. Applying the method to the data from two Italian universities, we find evidence that university grants are effective in preventing students from low-income families from dropping out of higher education.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Exploiting multiple outcomes in Bayesian principal stratification analysis with application to the evaluation of a job training program

The causal effect of a randomized job training program, the JOBS II study, on trainees' depression is evaluated. Principal stratification is used to deal with noncompliance to the assigned treatment. Due to the latent nature of the principal strata, strong structural assumptions are often invoked to identify principal causal effects. Alternatively, distributional assumptions may be invoked using a model-based approach. These often lead to weakly identified models with substantial regions of flatness in the posterior distribution of the causal effects. Information on multiple outcomes is routinely collected in practice, but is rarely used to improve inference. This article develops a Bayesian approach to exploit multivariate outcomes to sharpen inferences in weakly identified principal stratification models. We show that inference for the causal effect on depression is significantly improved by using the re-employment status as a secondary outcome in the JOBS II study. Simulation studies are also performed to illustrate the potential gains in the estimation of principal causal effects from jointly modeling more than one outcome. This approach can also be used to assess plausibility of structural assumptions and sensitivity to deviations from these structural assumptions. Two model checking procedures via posterior predictive checks are also discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Improving Inference of Gaussian Mixtures Using Auxiliary Variables

Expanding a lower-dimensional problem to a higher-dimensional space and then projecting back is often beneficial. This article rigorously investigates this perspective in the context of finite mixture models, namely how to improve inference for mixture models by using auxiliary variables. Despite the large literature in mixture models and several empirical examples, there is no previous work that gives general theoretical justification for including auxiliary variables in mixture models, even for special cases. We provide a theoretical basis for comparing inference for mixture multivariate models with the corresponding inference for marginal univariate mixture models. Analytical results for several special cases are established. We show that the probability of correctly allocating mixture memberships and the information number for the means of the primary outcome in a bivariate model with two Gaussian mixtures are generally larger than those in each univariate model. Simulations under a range of scenarios, including misspecified models, are conducted to examine the improvement. The method is illustrated by two real applications in ecology and causal inference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access