Source author record

Fabricio Oliveira

Fabricio Oliveira appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

An efficient mixed-integer linear programming formulation for solving influence diagrams

Influence diagrams represent decision-making problems with interdependencies between random events, decisions, and consequences. Traditionally, they have been solved using algorithms that determine the expected utility-maximizing decision strategy. In contrast, state-of-the-art solution approaches convert influence diagrams into a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model, which can be solved with powerful off-the-shelf MILP solvers. From a computational standpoint, the existing MILP formulations can be efficiently solved when applied to influence diagrams that represent periodic (or sequential) decision processes, which can be cast as partially observable Markov Decision Processes. However, they are inefficient in problems that lack a periodic structure or if the nodes in the influence diagram have large state spaces, thus limiting their practical use. In this paper, we present an efficient MILP formulation that is specifically designed for influence diagrams that are challenging for the earlier MILP formulation-based methods. Additionally, we present how the proposed formulation can be adapted to maximize conditional value-at-risk and how chance and logical constraints can be incorporated into the formulation, thus retaining the modeling flexibility of the MILP-based methods. Finally, we perform computational experiments addressing problems from the literature and compare the computational efficiency of the proposed formulation against the available MILP formulations for the reported influence diagrams. We find that the MILP models based on the proposed formulations can be solved significantly more efficiently compared to the state-of-the-art when solving influence diagrams that cannot be cast as partially observable Markov decision processes.

preprint2020arXiv

Decision Programming for Multi-Stage Optimization under Uncertainty

Influence diagrams are widely employed to represent multi-stage decision problems in which each decision is a choice from a discrete set of alternatives, uncertain chance events have discrete outcomes, and prior decisions may influence the probability distributions of uncertain chance events endogenously. In this paper, we develop the Decision Programming framework which extends the applicability of influence diagrams by developing mixed-integer linear programming formulations for solving such problems in the presence of many kinds of constraints. In particular, Decision Programming makes it possible to (i) solve problems in which earlier decisions cannot necessarily be recalled later, for instance, when decisions are taken by agents who cannot communicate with each other; (ii) accommodate a broad range of deterministic and chance constraints, including those based on resource consumption, logical dependencies or risk measures such as Conditional Value-at-Risk; and (iii) determine all non-dominated decision strategies in problems which involve multiple value objectives. In project portfolio selection problems, Decision Programming allows scenario probabilities to depend endogenously on project decisions and can thus be viewed as a generalization of Contingent Portfolio Programming.

preprint2019arXiv

Utility-Scale Energy Storage in an Imperfectly Competitive Power Sector

Interest in sustainability has increased the share of variable renewable energy sources (VRES) in power generation. Energy storage systems' potential to mitigate intermittencies from non-dispatchable VRES has enhanced their appeal. However, the impacts of storage vary based on the owner and market conditions. We examine the policy implications of investments in utility-scale battery storage via a bi-level optimization model. The lower level depicts power system operations, modeled as either perfect competition or Cournot oligopoly to allow for the assessment of producer market power. The upper-level investor is either a welfare-maximizer or a profit-maximizing standalone merchant to reflect either welfare enhancement or arbitrage, respectively. We implement a realistic case study for Western Europe based on all possible size-location storage investment combinations. We find that market competition affects investment sizes, locations, and their profitability more than the investor's objectives. A welfare-maximizer under perfect competition invests the most in storage capacity. Consumers typically gain most from storage investments in all cases, exceeding the gains for the investors. Specifically, our results show that storage investments may either not occur or be located differently than at social optimum, if market power is exerted. Thus, policy makers need to anticipate producer market power when setting regulation.