Researcher profile

Fábio Protti

Fábio Protti contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Convex geometries over induced paths with bounded length

Graph convexity spaces have been studied in many contexts. In particular, some studies are devoted to determine if a graph equipped with a convexity space is a {\em convex geometry}. It is well known that chordal and Ptolemaic graphs can be characterized as convex geometries with respect to the geodesic and monophonic convexities, respectively. Weak polarizable graphs, interval graphs, and proper interval graphs can also be characterized in this way. In this paper we introduce the notion of {\em $l^k$-convexity}, a natural restriction of the monophonic convexity. Let $G$ be a graph and $k\geq 2$ an integer. A subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ is \textit{$l^k$-convex} if and only if for any pair of vertices $x,y$ of $S$, each induced path of length {\em at most} $k$ connecting $x$ and $y$ is completely contained in the subgraph induced by $S$. The {\em $l^k$-convexity} consists of all $l^k$-convex subsets of $G$. In this work, we characterize {\em $l^k$-convex geometries} (graphs that are convex geometries with respect to the $l^k$-convexity) for $k\in\{2,3\}$. We show that a graph $G$ is an $l^2$-convex geometry if and only if $G$ is a chordal $P_4$-free graph, and an $l^3$-convex geometry if and only if $G$ is a chordal graph with diameter at most three such that its induced gems satisfy a special "solving" property. As far as the authors know, the class of $l^3$-convex geometries is the first example of a non-hereditary class of convex geometries.

preprint2013arXiv

Clique cycle-transversals in distance-hereditary graphs

A cycle-transversal of a graph G is a subset T of V(G) such that T intersects every cycle of G. A clique cycle-transversal, or cct for short, is a cycle-transversal which is a clique. Recognizing graphs which admit a cct can be done in polynomial time; however, no structural characterization of such graphs is known. We characterize distance-hereditary graphs admitting a cct in terms of forbidden induced subgraphs. This extends similar results for chordal graphs and cographs.

preprint2012arXiv

Revisiting the Complexity of And/Or Graph Solution

This paper presents a study on two data structures that have been used to model several problems in computer science: and/or graphs and x-y graphs. An and/or graph is an acyclic digraph containing a source, such that every vertex v has a label f(v) \in {and,or} and edges represent dependency relations between vertices: a vertex labeled and depends on all of its out-neighbors, while a vertex labeled or depends on only one of its out-neighbors. X-y graphs are defined as a natural generalization of and/or graphs: every vertex vi of an x-y graph has a label xi-yi to mean that vi depends on xi of its yi out-neighbors. We analyze the complexity of the optimization problems Min-and/or and Min-x-y, which consist of finding solution subgraphs of optimal weight for and/or and x-y graphs, respectively. Motivated by the large applicability as well as the hardness of Min-and/or and Min-x-y, we study new complexity aspects of such problems, both from a classical and a parameterized point of view. We prove that Min-and/or remains NP-hard even for a very restricted family of and/or graphs where edges have weight one and or-vertices have out-degree at most two (apart from other property related to some in-degrees), and that deciding whether there is a solution subtree with weight exactly k of a given x-y tree is also NP-hard. We also show that: (i) the parameterized problem Min-and/or(k, r), which asks whether there is a solution subgraph of weight at most k where every or-vertex has at most r out-edges with the same weight, is FPT; (ii) the parameterized problem Min-and/or0(k), whose domain includes and/or graphs allowing zero-weight edges, is W[2]-hard; (iii) the parameterized problem Min-x-y(k) is W[1]-hard.