BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Evangelos Karapanos contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Identity and collaboration
Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.
Log in to claimDirect collaboration
Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
This paper introduces the use of electroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking in exploring customer experiences in service design. These tools are expected to allow designers to generate customer journeys from empirical data leading to new visualization methods and therefore improvements in service design deliverables.
Experience Sampling has been considered the golden standard of in-situ measurement, yet, at the expense of high burden to participants. In this paper we propose Technology-Assisted Reconstruction (TAR), a methodological approach that combines passive logging of users' behaviors with use of these data in assisting the reconstruction of behaviors and experiences. Through a number of recent and ongoing projects we will discuss how TAR may be employed for the evaluation of personal informatics systems, but also, conversely, how ideas from the field of personal informatics may contribute towards the development of new methodologies for in-situ evaluation.
With the increasing emphasis on how mobile technologies are experienced in everyday life, researchers are increasingly emphasizing the use of in-situ methods such as Experience Sampling and Day Reconstruction. In our line of research we explore the concept of Technology-Assisted Reconstruction, in which passively logged behavior data assist in the later reconstruction of daily experiences. In this paper we introduce Footprint tracker, a web application that supports participants in reviewing lifelogs and reconstructing their daily experiences. We focus on three kinds of data: visual (as captured through Microsoft's sensecam), location, and context (i.e., SMS and calls received and made). We describe how Footprint Tracker supports the user in reviewing these lifelogs and outline a field study that attempts to inquire into whether and how this data support reconstruction from memory.
We introduce Senseμ (pronounced "sense me"), a mobile application that aims at supporting awareness in parent- child relationships through the sensing capabilities of mobile devices. We discuss the relevance of three types of awareness information: physical activity inferred from accelerometers, verbal activity during class hours inferred from microphones, and social activity inferred from Bluetooth pair-wise proximity sensing. We describe how we attempt to contextualize these sensing data with the goal of supporting parents' awareness of the educational performance and social wellbeing of their children, as well as motivating and sustaining a two-way communication between parents and teachers over the long term.
We present iScale, a survey tool for the retrospective elicitation of longitudinal user experience data. iScale employs sketching in imposing a process in the reconstruction of one's experiences with the aim to minimize retrospection bias. Two versions, the Constructive and the Value-Account iScale, were motivated by two distinct theories on how people reconstruct emotional experiences from memory. These two versions were tested in two separate studies. Study 1 aimed at providing qualitative insight into the use of iScale and compared its performance to that of free-hand sketching. Study 2 compared the two versions of iScale to free recall, a control condition that does not influence the reconstruction process. Significant differences between iScale and free recall were found. Overall, iScale resulted in an increase in the amount, the richness, and the test-retest reliability of recalled information. These results provide support for the viability of retrospective techniques as a cost-effective alternative to longitudinal studies.