BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Eugene Vasiliev

Eugene Vasiliev contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEgr-qcastro-ph.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
10works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Measuring the Milky Way mass distribution in the presence of the LMC

The ongoing interaction between the Milky Way (MW) and its largest satellite - the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) - creates a significant perturbation in the distribution and kinematics of distant halo stars, globular clusters and satellite galaxies, and leads to biases in MW mass estimates from these tracer populations. We present a method for compensating these perturbations for any choice of MW potential by computing the past trajectory of LMC and MW and then integrating the orbits of tracer objects back in time until the influence of the LMC is negligible, at which point the equilibrium approximation can be used with any standard dynamical modelling approach. We add this orbit-rewinding step to the mass estimation approach based on simultaneous fitting of the potential and the distribution function of tracers, and apply it to two datasets with the latest Gaia EDR3 measurements of 6d phase-space coordinates: globular clusters and satellite galaxies. We find that models with LMC mass in the range (1-2)x10^11 Msun better fit the observed distribution of tracers, and measure MW mass within 100 kpc to be (0.75+-0.1)x10^12 Msun, while neglecting the LMC perturbation increases it by ~15%.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Non-Parametric Spherical Jeans Mass Estimation with B-splines

Spherical Jeans modeling is widely used to estimate mass profiles of systems from star clusters to galactic stellar haloes to clusters of galaxies. It derives the cumulative mass profile, M(<r), from kinematics of tracers of the potential under the assumptions of spherical symmetry and dynamical equilibrium. We consider the application of Jeans modeling to mapping the dark matter distribution in the outer reaches of the Milky Way using field halo stars. We present a novel non-parametric routine for solving the spherical Jeans equation by fitting B-splines to the velocity and density profiles of halo stars. While most implementations assume parametric forms for these profiles, B-splines provide non-parametric fitting curves with analytical derivatives. Our routine recovers the mass profiles of equilibrium systems with flattened haloes or a stellar disc and bulge excellently (<~ 10% error at most radii). Tests with non-equilibrium, Milky Way-like galaxies from the Latte suite of FIRE-2 simulations perform quite well (<~ 15% error for r <~ 100 kpc). We also create observationally motivated datasets for the Latte suite by imposing selection functions and errors on phase space coordinates characteristic of Gaia and the DESI Milky Way Survey. The resulting imprecise and incomplete data require us to introduce an MCMC-based subroutine to obtain deconvolved density and velocity dispersion profiles from the tracer population. With these observational effects taken into account, the accuracy of the Jeans mass estimate remains at the level 20% or better.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Radialization of satellite orbits in galaxy mergers

We consider the orbital evolution of satellites in galaxy mergers, focusing on the evolution of eccentricity. Using a large suite of N-body simulations, we study the phenomenon of satellite orbital radialization -- a profound increase in the eccentricity of its orbit as it decays under dynamical friction. While radialization is detected in a variety of different setups, it is most efficient in the cases of high satellite mass, not very steep host density profiles, and high initial eccentricity. To understand the origin of this phenomenon, we run additional simulations with various physical factors selectively turned off: satellite mass loss, reflex motion and distortion of the host, etc. We find that all these factors are important for radialization, since it does not occur for point-mass satellites or when the host potential is replaced with an unperturbed initial profile. The analysis of forces and torques acting on both galaxies confirms the major role of self-gravity of both host and satellite in the reduction of orbital angular momentum. The classical Chandrasekhar dynamical friction formula, which accounts only for the forces between the host and the satellite, but not for internal distortions of both galaxies, does not match the evolution of eccentricity observed in N-body simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Local Group Mass in the light of Gaia

High accuracy proper motions (PMs) of M31 and other Local Group satellites have now been provided by the {\it Gaia} satellite. We revisit the Timing Argument to compute the total mass $M$ of the Local Group from the orbit of the Milky Way and M31, allowing for the Cosmological Constant. We rectify for a systematic effect caused by the presence of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). The interaction of the LMC with the Milky Way induces a motion towards the LMC. This contribution to the measured velocity of approach of the Milky Way and M31 must be removed. We allow for cosmic bias and scatter by extracting correction factors tailored to the accretion history of the Local Group. The distribution of correction factors is centered around $0.63$ with a scatter $\pm 0.2$, indicating that the Timing Argument significantly overestimates the true mass. Adjusting for all these effects, the estimated mass of the Local Group is $ M = 3.4^{+1.4}_{-1.1} \times 10^{12} M_{\odot}$ (68 % CL) when using the M31 tangential velocity $ 82^{+38}_{-35}$ km/s. Lower tangential velocity models with $59^{+42}_{-38}$ km/s (derived from the same PM data with a flat prior on the tangential velocity) lead to an estimated mass of $ M = 3.1^{+1.3}_{-1.0} \times 10^{12} M_{\odot}$ (68 % CL). By making an inventory of the total mass associated with the 4 most substantial LG members (the Milky Way, M31, M33 and the LMC), we estimate the known mass is in the range $3.7^{+0.5}_{-0.5} \times 10^{12} \, M_{\odot}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The stellar mass distribution of the Milky Way&#39;s bar: an analytic model

We present an analytic model of the stellar mass distribution of the Milky Way bar. The model is obtained by fitting a multi-component parametric density distribution to a made-to-measure N-body model of Portail et al., constructed to match a variety of density and kinematics observational data. The analytic model reproduces in detail the 3D density distribution of the N-body bar including the X-shape. The model and the gravitational potential it generates are available as part of the software package AGAMA for galactic dynamics, and can be readily used for orbit integrations, hydrodynamical simulations or other applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Tango for three: Sagittarius, LMC, and the Milky Way

We assemble a catalogue of candidate Sagittarius stream members with 5d and 6d phase-space information, using astrometric data from Gaia DR2, distances estimated from RR Lyrae stars, and line-of-sight velocities from various spectroscopic surveys. We find a clear misalignment between the stream track and the direction of the reflex-corrected proper motions in the leading arm of the stream, which we interpret as a signature of a time-dependent perturbation of the gravitational potential. A likely cause of this perturbation is the recent passage of the most massive Milky Way satellite - the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). We develop novel methods for simulating the Sagittarius stream in the presence of the LMC, using specially tailored N-body simulations and a flexible parametrization of the Milky Way halo density profile. We find that while models without the LMC can fit most stream features rather well, they fail to reproduce the misalignment and overestimate the distance to the leading arm apocentre. On the other hand, models with an LMC mass in the range (1.3+-0.3)x10^11 Msun rectify these deficiencies. We demonstrate that the stream can not be modelled adequately in a static Milky Way. Instead, our Galaxy is required to lurch toward the massive in-falling Cloud, giving the Sgr stream its peculiar shape and kinematics. By exploring the parameter space of Milky Way potentials, we determine the enclosed mass within 100 kpc to be (5.6+-0.4)x10^11 Msun, and the virial mass to be (9.0+-1.3)x10^11 Msun, and find tentative evidence for a radially-varying shape and orientation of the Galactic halo.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Rates of Stellar Tidal Disruption

Tidal disruption events occur rarely in any individual galaxy. Over the last decade, however, time-domain surveys have begun to accumulate statistical samples of these flares. What dynamical processes are responsible for feeding stars to supermassive black holes? At what rate are stars tidally disrupted in realistic galactic nuclei? What may we learn about supermassive black holes and broader astrophysical questions by estimating tidal disruption event rates from observational samples of flares? These are the questions we aim to address in this Chapter, which summarizes current theoretical knowledge about rates of stellar tidal disruption, and compares theoretical predictions to the current state of observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A new implementation of the Schwarzschild method for constructing observationally-driven dynamical models of galaxies of all morphological types

We present Forstand, a new code for constructing dynamical models of galaxies with the Schwarzschild orbit-superposition method. These models are constrained by line-of-sight kinematic observations and applicable to galaxies of all morphological types, including disks and triaxial rotating bars. Our implementation has several novel and improved features, is computationally efficient, and made publicly available. Using mock datasets taken from N-body simulations, we demonstrate that the pattern speed of a bar can be recovered with an accuracy of 10-20%, regardless of orientation, if the 3D shape of the galaxy is known or inferred correctly.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Schwarzschild modeling of barred galaxies

We review the Schwarzschild orbit-superposition approach and present a new implementation of this method, which can deal with a large class of systems, including rotating barred disk galaxies. We discuss two conceptuals problems in this field: the intrinsic degeneracy of determining the potential from line-of-sight kinematics, and the non-uniqueness of deprojection and related biases in potential inference, especially acute for triaxial bars. When applied to mock datasets with known 3d shape, our method correctly recovers the pattern speed and other potential parameters. However, more work is needed to systematically address these two problems for real observational datasets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Using Gaia for studying Milky Way star clusters

We review the implications of the Gaia Data Release 2 catalogue for studying the dynamics of Milky Way globular clusters, focusing on two separate topics. The first one is the analysis of the full 6-dimensional phase-space distribution of the entire population of Milky Way globular clusters: their mean proper motions (PM) can be measured with an exquisite precision (down to 0.05 mas/yr, including systematic errors). Using these data, and a suitable ansatz for the steady-state distribution function (DF) of the cluster population, we then determine simultaneously the best-fit parameters of this DF and the total Milky Way potential. We also discuss possible correlated structures in the space of integrals of motion. The second topic addresses the internal dynamics of a few dozen of the closest and richest globular clusters, again using the Gaia PM to measure the velocity dispersion and internal rotation, with a proper treatment of spatially correlated systematic errors. Clear rotation signatures are detected in 10 clusters, and a few more show weaker signatures at a level >=0.05$ mas/yr. PM dispersion profiles can be reliably measured down to 0.1 mas/yr, and agree well with the line-of-sight velocity dispersion profiles from the literature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access