Researcher profile

Ernst C. Wit

Ernst C. Wit contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A predictive model for planning emergency events rescue during COVID-19 in Lombardy, Italy

Italy, particularly the Lombardy region, was among the first countries outside of Asia to report cases of COVID-19. The emergency medical service called Regional Emergency Agency (AREU) coordinates the intra- and inter-regional non-hospital emergency network and the European emergency number service in Lombardy. AREU must deal with daily and seasonal variations of call volume. The number and type of emergency calls changed dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. A model to predict incoming calls and how many of these turn into events, i.e., dispatch of transport and equipment until the rescue is completed, was developed to address the emergency period. We used the generalized additive model with a negative binomial family to predict the number of events one, two, five, and seven days ahead. The over-dispersion of the data was tackled by using the negative binomial family and the nonlinear relationship between the number of events and covariates (e.g., seasonal effects) by smoothing splines. The model coefficients show the effect of variables, e.g., the day of the week, on the number of events and how these effects change during the pre-COVID-19 period. The proposed model returns reasonable mean absolute errors for most of the 2020-2021 period.

preprint2020arXiv

COVID-19 and the difficulty of inferring epidemiological parameters from clinical data

Knowing the infection fatality ratio (IFR) is of crucial importance for evidence-based epidemic management: for immediate planning; for balancing the life years saved against the life years lost due to the consequences of management; and for evaluating the ethical issues associated with the tacit willingness to pay substantially more for life years lost to the epidemic, than for those to other diseases. Against this background Verity et al. (2020, Lancet Infections Diseases) have rapidly assembled case data and used statistical modelling to infer the IFR for COVID-19. We have attempted an in-depth statistical review of their approach, to identify to what extent the data are sufficiently informative about the IFR to play a greater role than the modelling assumptions, and have tried to identify those assumptions that appear to play a key role. Given the difficulties with other data sources, we provide a crude alternative analysis based on the Diamond Princess Cruise ship data and case data from China, and argue that, given the data problems, modelling of clinical data to obtain the IFR can only be a stop-gap measure. What is needed is near direct measurement of epidemic size by PCR and/or antibody testing of random samples of the at risk population.