BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Engkarat Techapanurak

Engkarat Techapanurak contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer VisionArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Bridging In- and Out-of-distribution Samples for Their Better Discriminability

This paper proposes a method for OOD detection. Questioning the premise of previous studies that ID and OOD samples are separated distinctly, we consider samples lying in the intermediate of the two and use them for training a network. We generate such samples using multiple image transformations that corrupt inputs in various ways and with different severity levels. We estimate where the generated samples by a single image transformation lie between ID and OOD using a network trained on clean ID samples. To be specific, we make the network classify the generated samples and calculate their mean classification accuracy, using which we create a soft target label for them. We train the same network from scratch using the original ID samples and the generated samples with the soft labels created for them. We detect OOD samples by thresholding the entropy of the predicted softmax probability. The experimental results show that our method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art in the standard benchmark tests. We also analyze the effect of the number and particular combinations of image corrupting transformations on the performance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Practical Evaluation of Out-of-Distribution Detection Methods for Image Classification

We reconsider the evaluation of OOD detection methods for image recognition. Although many studies have been conducted so far to build better OOD detection methods, most of them follow Hendrycks and Gimpel's work for the method of experimental evaluation. While the unified evaluation method is necessary for a fair comparison, there is a question of if its choice of tasks and datasets reflect real-world applications and if the evaluation results can generalize to other OOD detection application scenarios. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the performance of representative OOD detection methods for three scenarios, i.e., irrelevant input detection, novel class detection, and domain shift detection, on various datasets and classification tasks. The results show that differences in scenarios and datasets alter the relative performance among the methods. Our results can also be used as a guide for practitioners for the selection of OOD detection methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Pushing the Envelope of Thin Crack Detection

In this study, we consider the problem of detecting cracks from the image of a concrete surface for automated inspection of infrastructure, such as bridges. Its overall accuracy is determined by how accurately thin cracks with sub-pixel widths can be detected. Our interest is in making it possible to detect cracks close to the limit of thinness if it can be defined. Toward this end, we first propose a method for training a CNN to make it detect cracks more accurately than humans while training them on human-annotated labels. To achieve this seemingly impossible goal, we intentionally lower the spatial resolution of input images while maintaining that of their labels when training a CNN. This makes it possible to annotate cracks that are too thin for humans to detect, which we call super-human labels. We experimentally show that this makes it possible to detect cracks from an image of one-third the resolution of images used for annotation with about the same accuracy. We additionally propose three methods for further improving the detection accuracy of thin cracks: i) P-pooling to maintain small image structures during downsampling operations; ii) Removal of short-segment cracks in a post-processing step utilizing a prior of crack shapes learned using the VAE-GAN framework; iii) Modeling uncertainty of the prediction to better handle hard labels beyond the limit of CNNs' detection ability, which technically work as noisy labels. We experimentally examine the effectiveness of these methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access