Source author record

Emil Molnár

Emil Molnár appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Non-fundamental trunc-simplex tilings and their optimal hyperball packings and coverings in hyperbolic space I. For families F1-F4

Supergroups of some hyperbolic space groups are classified as a continuation of our former works. Fundamental domains will be integer parts of truncated tetrahedra belonging to families F1 - F4, for a while, by the notation of E. Molnár et al. in $2006$. As an application, optimal congruent hyperball packings and coverings to the truncation base planes with their very good densities are computed. This covering density is better than the conjecture of L.~Fejes~Tóth for balls and horoballs in $1964$.

preprint2016arXiv

Top dense hyperbolic ball packings and coverings for complete Coxeter orthoscheme groups

In $n$-dimensional hyperbolic space $\mathbf{H}^n$ $(n\ge2)$ there are $3$-types of spheres (balls): the sphere, horosphere and hypersphere. If $n=2,3$ we know an universal upper bound of the ball packing densities, where each ball volume is related to the volume of the corresponding Dirichlet-Voronoi (D-V) cell. E.g. in $\mathbf{H}^3$ the densest horoball packing is derived from the $\{3,3,6\}$ Coxeter tiling consisting of ideal regular simplices $T_{reg}^\infty$ with dihedral angles $\fracπ{3}$. The density of this packing is $δ_3^\infty\approx 0.85328$ and this provides a very rough upper bound for the ball packing densities as well. However, there are no "essential" results regarding the "classical" ball packings with congruent balls, and for ball coverings either. The goal of this paper to find the extremal ball arrangements in $\mathbf{H}^3$ with "classical balls". We consider only periodic congruent ball arrangements (for simplicity) related to the generalized, so-called {\it complete Coxeter orthoschemes} and their extended groups. In Theorems 1.1-1.2 we formulate also conjectures for the densest ball packing with density $0.77147\dots$ and the loosest ball covering with density $1.36893\dots$, respectively. Both are related with the extended Coxeter group $(5, 3, 5)$ and the so-called hyperbolic football manifold (look at Fig.~3). These facts can have important relations with fullerens in crystallography.

preprint2013arXiv

Volumes and geodesic ball packings to the regular prism tilings in $\widetilde{\mathbf{S}\mathbf{L}_2\mathbf{R}}$ space

After having investigated the regular prisms and prism tilings in the $\SLR$ space in the previous work \cite{Sz13-1} of the second author, we consider the problem of geodesic ball packings related to those tilings and their symmetry groups $\mathbf{pq2_1}$. $\SLR$ is one of the eight Thurston geometries that can be derived from the 3-dimensional Lie group of all $2\times 2$ real matrices with determinant one. In this paper we consider geodesic spheres and balls in $\SLR$ (even in $\mathbf{SL_{\mathrm{2}}R})$, if their radii $ρ\in [0, \fracπ{2})$, and determine their volumes. Moreover, we consider the prisms of the above space and compute their volumes, define the notion of the geodesic ball packing and its density. We develop a procedure to determine the densities of the densest geodesic ball packings for the tilings, or in this paper more precisely, for their generating groups $\mathbf{pq2_1}$ (for integer rotational parameters $p,q$; $3\le p, \frac{2p}{p-2} <q$). We look for those parameters $p$ and $q$ above, where the packing density large enough as possible. Now our record is $0.567362$ for $(p, q) = (8, 10)$. These computations seem to be important, since we do not know optimal ball packing, namely in the hyperbolic space $\HYP$. We know only the density upper bound 0.85326, realized by horoball packing of $\HYP$ to its ideal regular simplex tiling. Surprisingly, for the so-called translation ball packings under the same groups $\mathbf{pq2_1}$ in \cite{MSzV13} we have got larger density $0.841700$ for $(p, q) = (5, 10000 \rightarrow \infty)$ close to the above upper bound. We use for the computation and visualization of the $\SLR$ space its projective model introduced by the first author in \cite{M97}.

preprint2011arXiv

Classification of Sol lattices

$\SOL$ geometry is one of the eight homogeneous Thurston 3-geomet-ri-es $$\EUC, \SPH, \HYP, \SXR, \HXR, \SLR, \NIL, \SOL.$$ In \cite{Sz10} the {\it densest lattice-like translation ball packings} to a type (type {\bf I/1} in this paper) of $\SOL$ lattices has been determined. Some basic concept of $\SOL$ were defined by {\sc{P. Scott}} in \cite{S}, in general. In our present work we shall classify $\SOL$ lattices in an algorithmic way into 17 (seventeen) types, in analogy of the 14 Bravais types of the Euclidean 3-lattices, but infinitely many $\SOL$ affine equivalence classes, in each type. Then the discrete isometry groups of compact fundamental domain (crystallographic groups) can also be classified into infinitely many classes but finitely many types, left to other publication. To this we shall study relations between $\SOL$ lattices and lattices of the pseudoeuclidean (or here rather called Minkowskian) plane \cite{AQ}. Moreover, we introduce the notion of $\SOL$ parallelepiped to every lattice type. From our new results we emphasize Theorems 3-4-5-6. In this paper we shall use the affine model of $\SOL$ space through affine-projective homogeneous coordinates \cite{M97} which gives a unified way of investigating and visualizing homogeneous spaces, in general.