Source author record

Elizaveta Ryspaeva

Elizaveta Ryspaeva appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Optical observations of PSR J2021+3651 in the Dragonfly Nebula with the GTC

PSR J2021+3651 is a 17 kyr old rotation powered pulsar detected in the radio, X-rays, and $γ$-rays. It powers a torus-like pulsar wind nebula with jets, dubbed the Dragonfly, which is very similar to that of the Vela pulsar. The Dragonfly is likely associated with the extended TeV source VER J2019+368 and extended radio emission. We conducted first deep optical observations with the GTC in the Sloan $r'$ band to search for optical counterparts of the pulsar and its nebula. No counterparts were detected down to $r'\gtrsim27.2$ and $\gtrsim24.8$ for the point-like pulsar and the compact X-ray nebula, respectively. We also reanalyzed Chandra archival X-ray data taking into account an interstellar extinction--distance relation, constructed by us for the Dragonfly line of sight using the red-clump stars as standard candles. This allowed us to constrain the distance to the pulsar, $D=1.8^{+1.7}_{-1.4}$ kpc at 90% confidence. It is much smaller than the dispersion measure distance of $\sim$12 kpc but compatible with a $γ$-ray "pseudo-distance" of 1 kpc. Based on that and the optical upper limits, we conclude that PSR J2021+3651, similar to the Vela pulsar, is a very inefficient nonthermal emitter in the optical and X-rays, while its $γ$-ray efficiency is consistent with an average efficiency for $γ$-pulsars of similar age. Our optical flux upper limit for the pulsar is consistent with the long-wavelength extrapolation of its X-ray spectrum while the nebula flux upper limit does not constrain the respective extrapolation.