Researcher profile

Elias Krainski

Elias Krainski contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Joint Modeling and Prediction of Massive Spatio-Temporal Wildfire Count and Burnt Area Data with the INLA-SPDE Approach

This paper describes the methodology used by the team RedSea in the data competition organized for EVA 2021 conference. We develop a novel two-part model to jointly describe the wildfire count data and burnt area data provided by the competition organizers with covariates. Our proposed methodology relies on the integrated nested Laplace approximation combined with the stochastic partial differential equation (INLA-SPDE) approach. In the first part, a binary non-stationary spatio-temporal model is used to describe the underlying process that determines whether or not there is wildfire at a specific time and location. In the second part, we consider a non-stationary model that is based on log-Gaussian Cox processes for positive wildfire count data, and a non-stationary log-Gaussian model for positive burnt area data. Dependence between the positive count data and positive burnt area data is captured by a shared spatio-temporal random effect. Our two-part modeling approach performs well in terms of the prediction score criterion chosen by the data competition organizers. Moreover, our model results show that surface pressure is the most influential driver for the occurrence of a wildfire, whilst surface net solar radiation and surface pressure are the key drivers for large numbers of wildfires, and temperature and evaporation are the key drivers of large burnt areas.

preprint2020arXiv

A joint bayesian space-time model to integrate spatially misaligned air pollution data in R-INLA

In air pollution studies, dispersion models provide estimates of concentration at grid level covering the entire spatial domain, and are then calibrated against measurements from monitoring stations. However, these different data sources are misaligned in space and time. If misalignment is not considered, it can bias the predictions. We aim at demonstrating how the combination of multiple data sources, such as dispersion model outputs, ground observations and covariates, leads to more accurate predictions of air pollution at grid level. We consider nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentration in Greater London and surroundings for the years 2007-2011, and combine two different dispersion models. Different sets of spatial and temporal effects are included in order to obtain the best predictive capability. Our proposed model is framed in between calibration and Bayesian melding techniques for data fusion red. Unlike other examples, we jointly model the response (concentration level at monitoring stations) and the dispersion model outputs on different scales, accounting for the different sources of uncertainty. Our spatio-temporal model allows us to reconstruct the latent fields of each model component, and to predict daily pollution concentrations. We compare the predictive capability of our proposed model with other established methods to account for misalignment (e.g. bilinear interpolation), showing that in our case study the joint model is a better alternative.