BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Eli David

Eli David contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer VisionCryptography and Security

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Gator: Customizable Channel Pruning of Neural Networks with Gating

The rise of neural network (NN) applications has prompted an increased interest in compression, with a particular focus on channel pruning, which does not require any additional hardware. Most pruning methods employ either single-layer operations or global schemes to determine which channels to remove followed by fine-tuning of the network. In this paper we present Gator, a channel-pruning method which temporarily adds learned gating mechanisms for pruning of individual channels, and which is trained with an additional auxiliary loss, aimed at reducing the computational cost due to memory, (theoretical) speedup (in terms of FLOPs), and practical, hardware-specific speedup. Gator introduces a new formulation of dependencies between NN layers which, in contrast to most previous methods, enables pruning of non-sequential parts, such as layers on ResNet's highway, and even removing entire ResNet blocks. Gator's pruning for ResNet-50 trained on ImageNet produces state-of-the-art (SOTA) results, such as 50% FLOPs reduction with only 0.4%-drop in top-5 accuracy. Also, Gator outperforms previous pruning models, in terms of GPU latency by running 1.4 times faster. Furthermore, Gator achieves improved top-5 accuracy results, compared to MobileNetV2 and SqueezeNet, for similar runtimes. The source code of this work is available at: https://github.com/EliPassov/gator.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Generating End-to-End Adversarial Examples for Malware Classifiers Using Explainability

In recent years, the topic of explainable machine learning (ML) has been extensively researched. Up until now, this research focused on regular ML users use-cases such as debugging a ML model. This paper takes a different posture and show that adversaries can leverage explainable ML to bypass multi-feature types malware classifiers. Previous adversarial attacks against such classifiers only add new features and not modify existing ones to avoid harming the modified malware executable's functionality. Current attacks use a single algorithm that both selects which features to modify and modifies them blindly, treating all features the same. In this paper, we present a different approach. We split the adversarial example generation task into two parts: First we find the importance of all features for a specific sample using explainability algorithms, and then we conduct a feature-specific modification, feature-by-feature. In order to apply our attack in black-box scenarios, we introduce the concept of transferability of explainability, that is, applying explainability algorithms to different classifiers using different features subsets and trained on different datasets still result in a similar subset of important features. We conclude that explainability algorithms can be leveraged by adversaries and thus the advocates of training more interpretable classifiers should consider the trade-off of higher vulnerability of those classifiers to adversarial attacks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access