Source author record

Eleonora Guerrini

Eleonora Guerrini appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Information Theory math.IT Discrete Mathematics math.CO Symbolic Computation

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works

5topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Enhancing simultaneous rational function recovery: adaptive error correction capability and new bounds for applications

In this work we present some results that allow to improve the decoding radius in solving polynomial linear systems with errors in the scenario where errors are additive and randomly distributed over a finite field. The decoding radius depends on some bounds on the solution that we want to recover, so their overestimation could significantly decrease our error correction capability. For this reason, we introduce an algorithm that can bridge this gap, introducing some ad hoc parameters that reduce the discrepancy between the estimate decoding radius and the effective error correction capability.

preprint2020arXiv

On the Uniqueness of Simultaneous Rational Function Reconstruction

This paper focuses on the problem of reconstructing a vector of rational functions given some evaluations, or more generally given their remainders modulo different polynomials. The special case of rational functions sharing the same denominator, a.k.a.Simultaneous Rational Function Reconstruction (SRFR), has many applications from linear system solving to coding theory, provided that SRFR has a unique solution. The number of unknowns in SRFR is smaller than for a general vector of rational function. This allows to reduce the number of evaluation points needed to guarantee the existence of a solution, but we may lose its uniqueness. In this work, we prove that uniqueness is guaranteed for a generic instance.

preprint2016arXiv

On optimal nonlinear systematic codes

Most bounds on the size of codes hold for any code, whether linear or not. Notably, the Griesmer bound holds only in the linear case and so optimal linear codes are not necessarily optimal codes. In this paper we identify code parameters $(q,d,k)$, namely field size, minimum distance and dimension, for which the Griesmer bound holds also in the (systematic) nonlinear case. Moreover, we show that the Griesmer bound does not necessarily hold for a systematic code by explicit construction of a family of optimal systematic binary codes. On the other hand, we are able to provide some versions of the Griesmer bound holding for all systematic codes.

preprint2015arXiv

On the Griesmer bound for nonlinear codes

Most bounds on the size of codes hold for any code, whether linear or nonlinear. Notably, the Griesmer bound, holds only in the linear case. In this paper we characterize a family of systematic nonlinear codes for which the Griesmer bound holds. Moreover, we show that the Griesmer bound does not necessarily hold for a systematic code by showing explicit counterexamples. On the other hand, we are also able to provide (weaker) versions of the Griesmer bound holding for all systematic codes.

preprint2012arXiv

A bound on the size of linear codes

We present a bound on the size of linear codes. This bound is independent of other known bounds, e.g. the Griesmer bound.

preprint2012arXiv

Some bounds on the size of codes

We present some upper bounds on the size of non-linear codes and their restriction to systematic codes and linear codes. These bounds are independent of other known theoretical bounds, e.g. the Griesmer bound, the Johnson bound or the Plotkin bound, and one of these is actually an improvement of a bound by Litsyn and Laihonen. Our experiments show that in some cases (the majority of cases for some q) our bounds provide the best value, compared to all other theoretical bounds.

preprint2011arXiv

Extremal graphs for the identifying code problem

An identifying code of a graph G is a dominating set C such that every vertex x of G is distinguished from all other vertices by the set of vertices in C that are at distance at most 1 from x. The problem of finding an identifying code of minimum possible size turned out to be a challenging problem. It was proved by N. Bertrand that if a graph on n vertices with at least one edge admits an identifying code, then a minimum identifying code has size at most n-1. Some classes of graphs whose smallest identifying code is of size n-1 were already known, and few conjectures were formulated to classify all these graphs. In this paper, disproving these conjectures, we classify all finite graphs for which all but one of the vertices are needed to form an identifying code. We also classify all infinite graphs needing the whole set of vertices in any identifying code. New upper bounds in terms of the number of vertices and the maximum degree of a graph are also provided.

preprint2009arXiv

Computing the distance distribution of systematic non-linear codes

The most important families of non-linear codes are systematic. A brute-force check is the only known method to compute their weight distribution and distance distribution. On the other hand, it outputs also all closest word pairs in the code. In the black-box complexity model, the check is optimal among closest-pair algorithms. In this paper we provide a Groebner basis technique to compute the weight/distance distribution of any systematic non-linear code. Also our technique outputs all closest pairs. Unlike the check, our method can be extended to work on code families.