BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Elemer E. Rosinger

Elemer E. Rosinger appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.GMphysics.gen-phmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
5topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Extended Tensor Products and Generalization of the Notion of Entanglement

Motivated by the novel applications of the mathematical formalism of quantum theory and its generalizations in cognitive science, psychology, social and political sciences, and economics, we extend the notion of the tensor product and entanglement. We also study the relation between conventional entanglement of complex qubits and our generalized entanglement. Our construction can also be used to describe entanglement in the framework of non-Archimedean physics. It is also possible to construct tensor products of non-Archimedean (e.g., $p$-adic) and complex Hilbert spaces.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Rigid and Non-Rigid Mathematical Theories: the Ring $\mathbb{Z}$ Is Nearly Rigid

Mathematical theories are classified in two distinct classes : {\it rigid}, and on the other hand, {\it non-rigid} ones. Rigid theories, like group theory, topology, category theory, etc., have a basic concept - given for instance by a set of axioms - from which all the other concepts are defined in a unique way. Non-rigid theories, like ring theory, certain general enough pseudo-topologies, etc., have a number of their concepts defined in a more free or relatively independent manner of one another, namely, with {\it compatibility} conditions between them only. As an example, it is shown that the usual ring structure on the integers $\mathbb{Z}$ is not rigid, however, it is nearly rigid.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Surprising Properties of Non-Archimedean Field Extensions of the Real Numbers

It is a rather universal tacit and unquestioned belief - and even more so among physicists - that there is one and only one set of real scalars, namely, the one given by the usual field $\mathbb{R}$ of real numbers, with its usual linear order structure on the geometric line. Such a dramatically limiting and thus harmful belief comes, unknown to equally many, from the similarly tacit acceptance of the ancient Archimedean Axiom in Euclid's Geometry. The consequence of that belief is a similar belief in the uniqueness of the field $\mathbb{C}$ of complex numbers, and therefore, of the various spaces, manifolds, etc., be they finite or infinite dimensional, constructed upon the real or complex numbers, including the Hilbert spaces used in Quantum Mechanics. An near total lack of awareness follows about the {\it rich self-similar} structure of various linearly ordered scalar fields obtained through the {\it ultrapower} construction which extend the usual field $\mathbb{R}$ of real numbers. Such {\it ultrapower field} extensions contain as a rather small subset the usual field $\mathbb{R}$ of real numbers. The rich self-similar structure of such field extensions is due to {\it infinitesimals}, and thus also of {\it infinitely large} elements in such fields, which make such fields {\it non-Archimedean}. With the concept of {\it walkable world}, which has highly intuitive and pragmatic algebraic and geometric meaning, the mentioned rich self-similar structure is illustrated. The ultrapower fields presented can have a wide ranging relevance in Physics, among others, for a proper treatment of what are usually called the "infinities in Physics". The ultrapower construction which gives such non-Archimedean fields is rather simple and elementary, requiring only 101 Algebra.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Two Theories of Special Relativity ?

Recently, [3], it was shown that Special Relativity is in fact based on one single physical axiom which is that of Reciprocity. Originally, Einstein, [1], established Special Relativity on two physical axioms, namely, the Galilean Relativity and the Constancy of the Speed of Light in inertial reference frames. Soon after, [4,5], it was shown that the Galilean Relativity alone is sufficient for Special Relativity. Here it is important to note that, implicitly, three more assumptions have been used on space-time coordinate transformations, namely, the homogeneity of space-time, the isotropy of space, and a mathematical condition of smoothness type. In [3], a boundedness condition on space-time coordinate transformations is used instead of a usual mathematical smoothness type condition. In this paper it is shown that the respective boundedness condition is closely related to a Principle of Transformation Increment Ratio Limitation, or in short, PTIRL, which has an obvious physical meaning. It is also shown that PTIRL is {\it not} a stronger assumption than that of the mentioned boundedness in [3]. Of interest is the fact that, by formulating PTIRL as a physical axiom, the possibility is opened up for the acceptance, or on the contrary, rejection of this physical axiom PTIRL, thus leading to {\it two} possible theories of Special Relativity. And to add further likelihood to such a possibility, the rejection of PTIRL leads easily to effects which involve unlimited time and/or space intervals, thus are not accessible to usual experimentation for the verification of their validity, or otherwise.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access