BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Eleanor C Sayre appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
Through a case study, we demonstrate that teachers can tacitly notice student epistemic framing, and that this noticing can prompt instructor action which tips student framing. Our study is based on video data taken during tutorial sections and oral exams in an upper-division, undergraduate physics course. We analyze one interaction between a student and the course instructor through the lenses of teacher noticing and epistemic framing.
Personalized undergraduate research programs can help increase undergraduate students' participation in research. Personas of undergraduate researchers are a powerful means of encapsulating the richness of students' various goals, motivations, and experiences in research. Student personas can support the design of research programs with student-centered approaches that better engage undergraduate students across multiple disciplines. We used interview data and drew on Self-Determination Theory to identify students' various goals and motivations in order to build three undergraduate researcher personas in physics.
Physics faculty care about their students learning physics content. In addition, they usually hope that their students will learn some deeper lessons about thinking critically and scientifically. They hope that as a result of taking a physics class, students will come to appreciate physics as a coherent and logical method of understanding the world, and recognize that they can use reason and experimentation to figure things out about the world. Physics education researchers have created several surveys to assess one important aspect of thinking like a physicist: what students believe that learning physics is all about. In this article, we introduce attitudes and beliefs surveys; and give advice on how to choose, administer, and score them in your classes. This article is a companion to Best Practices for Administering Concept Inventories (The Physics Teacher, 2017), which introduces and answers common questions around concept inventories, which are research-based assessments of physics content topics.
We investigate how students solve partial differential equations and partial derivatives in the context of quantum mechanics. We use the resources framework to investigate students' discussion in a group problem-solving environment to investigate the fine-grain elements of their problem solving. We analyze an example of students' use of separation of variables to solve a partial differential equation for a free particle problem. We identify a mathematical action called "pulling out" as a procedural resource to help students with separating the time part from the space part of the wave function in the course of solving the time-dependent Schrodinger equation. We discuss how students use "pulling out" as a procedural step in solving partial differential equations and sense-making.
Many studies have investigated students' epistemological framing when solving physics problems. Framing supports students' problem solving as they decide what knowledge to employ and the necessary steps to solve the problem. Students may frame the same problem differently and take alternate paths to a correct solution. When students work in group settings, they share and discuss their framing to decide how to proceed in problem solving as a whole group. In this study, we investigate how groups of students negotiate their framing and frame shifts in group problem solving.
We define knowledge as facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education. In turn, Disciplinary Knowledge is the knowledge related to a specific field or discipline, such as physics. Accountable Disciplinary Knowledge (ADK) is "what counts" as important to a community or discipline: the kinds of activities that participants engage in, the problems they value and solve, and methods for solving those problems. Because ADK is determined on a community basis, the details of "what counts" will vary with the norms and expectations of the community. In this paper, we use the ADK framework to investigate "what counts" as solving problems well in a high school physics classroom from the perspective of the students.