Source author record

Eldert J. van Henten

Eldert J. van Henten appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Active learning with MaskAL reduces annotation effort for training Mask R-CNN

The generalisation performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) is influenced by the quantity, quality, and variety of the training images. Training images must be annotated, and this is time consuming and expensive. The goal of our work was to reduce the number of annotated images needed to train a CNN while maintaining its performance. We hypothesised that the performance of a CNN can be improved faster by ensuring that the set of training images contains a large fraction of hard-to-classify images. The objective of our study was to test this hypothesis with an active learning method that can automatically select the hard-to-classify images. We developed an active learning method for Mask Region-based CNN (Mask R-CNN) and named this method MaskAL. MaskAL involved the iterative training of Mask R-CNN, after which the trained model was used to select a set of unlabelled images about which the model was most uncertain. The selected images were then annotated and used to retrain Mask R-CNN, and this was repeated for a number of sampling iterations. In our study, MaskAL was compared to a random sampling method on a broccoli dataset with five visually similar classes. MaskAL performed significantly better than the random sampling. In addition, MaskAL had the same performance after sampling 900 images as the random sampling had after 2300 images. Compared to a Mask R-CNN model that was trained on the entire training set (14,000 images), MaskAL achieved 93.9% of that model's performance with 17.9% of its training data. The random sampling achieved 81.9% of that model's performance with 16.4% of its training data. We conclude that by using MaskAL, the annotation effort can be reduced for training Mask R-CNN on a broccoli dataset with visually similar classes. Our software is available on https://github.com/pieterblok/maskal.