Researcher profile

Eiliv Lund

Eiliv Lund contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

From GWAS to transcriptomics in prospective cancer design - new statistical challenges

Background. With the increasing interest in post-GWAS research which represents a transition from genome-wide association discovery to analysis of functional mechanisms, attention has been lately focused on the potential of including various biological material in epidemiological studies. In particular, exploration of the carcinogenic process through transcriptional analysis at the epidemiological level opens up new horizons in functional analysis and causal inference, and requires a new design together with adequate analysis procedures. Results. In this article, we present the post-genome design implemented in the NOWAC cohort as an example of a prospective nested case-control study built for transcriptomics use, and discuss analytical strategies to explore the changes occurring in transcriptomics during the carcinogenic process in association with questionnaire information. We emphasize the inadequacy of survival analysis models usually considered in GWAS for post-genome design, and propose instead to parameterize the gene trajectories during the carcinogenic process. Conclusions. This novel approach, in which transcriptomics are considered as potential intermediate biomarkers of cancer and exposures, offers a flexible framework which can include various biological assumptions.

preprint2012arXiv

Generalization of the normal-exponential model: exploration of a more accurate parametrisation for the signal distribution on Illumina BeadArrays

Motivation: Illumina BeadArray technology includes negative control features that allow a precise estimation of the background noise. As an alternative to the background subtraction proposed in BeadStudio which leads to an important loss of information by generating negative values, a background correction method modeling the observed intensities as the sum of the exponentially distributed signal and normally distributed noise has been developed. Nevertheless, Wang and Ye (2011) display a kernel-based estimator of the signal distribution on Illumina BeadArrays and suggest that a gamma distribution would represent a better modeling of the signal density. Hence, the normal-exponential modeling may not be appropriate for Illumina data and background corrections derived from this model may lead to wrong estimation. Results: We propose a more flexible modeling based on a gamma distributed signal and a normal distributed background noise and develop the associated background correction. Our model proves to be markedly more accurate to model Illumina BeadArrays: on the one hand, this model offers a more correct fit of the observed intensities. On the other hand, the comparison of the operating characteristics of several background correction procedures on spike-in and on normal-gamma simulated data shows high similarities, reinforcing the validation of the normal-gamma modeling. The performance of the background corrections based on the normal-gamma and normal-exponential models are compared on two dilution data sets. Surprisingly, we observe that the implementation of a more accurate parametrisation in the model-based background correction does not increase the sensitivity. These results may be explained by the operating characteristics of the estimators: the normal-gamma background correction offers an improvement in terms of bias, but at the cost of a loss in precision.