Researcher profile

E. Waxman

E. Waxman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

IceCube's Neutrinos: The beginning of extra-Galactic neutrino astrophysics?

The flux, spectrum and angular distribution of the excess neutrino signal detected by IceCube between 50TeV and 2PeV are inconsistent with those expected for Galactic sources. The coincidence of the excess, $E_ν^2Φ_ν=3.6\pm1.2\times10^{-8}(GeV/ cm^2 sr s)$, with the Waxman-Bahcall (WB) bound, $E_ν^2Φ_{WB}=3.4\times10^{-8}(GeV/cm^2 sr s)$, is probably a clue to the origin of IceCube&#39;s neutrinos. The most natural explanation of this coincidence is that both the neutrino excess and the ultra-high energy, $>10^{19}$ eV, cosmic-ray (UHECR) flux are produced by the same population of cosmologically distributed sources, producing CRs, likely protons, at a similar rate, $E^2 dQ/dE=0.5\times10^{44}(erg/Mpc^3yr)$ (at z=0), across a wide range of energies, from $10^{15}$ eV to $>10^{20}$ eV, and residing in environments (such as starburst galaxies) in which CRs of rigidity $E/Z< 10^{17}$ eV lose much of their energy to pion production. Identification of the neutrino sources will allow one to identify the UHECR accelerators, to resolve open questions related to the accelerator models, and to study neutrino properties (related e.g. to flavor oscillations and coupling to gravity) with an accuracy many orders of magnitude better than is currently possible. The most promising method for identifying the sources is by association of a neutrino with an electromagnetic signal accompanying a transient event responsible for its generation. The neutrino flux that is produced within the sources, and that may thus be directly associated with transient events, may be significantly lower than the total observed neutrino flux, which may be dominated by neutrino production at the environment in which the sources reside.

preprint2008arXiv

An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova

Massive stars end their short lives in spectacular explosions, supernovae, that synthesize new elements and drive galaxy evolution. Throughout history supernovae were discovered chiefly through their delayed optical light, preventing observations in the first moments (hours to days) following the explosion. As a result, the progenitors of some supernovae and the events leading up to their violent demise remain intensely debated. Here we report the serendipitous discovery of a supernova at the time of explosion, marked by an extremely luminous X-ray outburst. We attribute the outburst to the break-out of the supernova shock-wave from the progenitor, and show that the inferred rate of such events agrees with that of all core-collapse supernovae. We forecast that future wide-field X-ray surveys will catch hundreds of supernovae each year in the act of explosion, and thereby enable crucial neutrino and gravitational wave detections that may ultimately unravel the explosion mechanism.

preprint2007arXiv

Cosmic rays from trans-relativistic supernovae

We derive constraints that must be satisfied by the sources of ~10^{15} to ~10^{18} eV cosmic rays, under the assumption that the sources are Galactic. We show that while these constraints are not satisfied by ordinary supernovae (SNe), which are believed to be the sources of <10^{15} eV cosmic rays, they may be satisfied by the recently discovered class of trans-relativistic supernovae (TRSNe), which were observed in association with gamma-ray bursts. We define TRSNe as SNe that deposit a large fraction, f_R>10^{-2}, of their kinetic energy in mildly relativistic, γβ>1, ejecta. The high velocity ejecta enable particle acceleration to ~10^{18} eV, and the large value of f_R (compared to f_R~10^{-7} for ordinary SNe) ensures that if TRSNe produce the observed ~10^{18} eV cosmic ray flux, they do not overproduce the flux at lower energies. This, combined with the estimated rate and energy production of TRSNe, imply that Galactic TRSNe may be the sources of cosmic rays with energies up to ~10^{18}eV .

preprint2007arXiv

GRB060218: A Relativistic Supernova Shock Breakout

We show that the prompt and afterglow X-ray emission of GRB060218, as well as its early (t<=1 d) optical-UV emission, can be explained by a model in which a radiation- mediated shock propagates through a compact progenitor star into a dense wind. The prompt thermal X-ray emission is produced in this model as the mildly relativistic shock, v/c=0.85 carrying few x 10^49 erg, reaches the wind (Thomson) photosphere, where the post-shock thermal radiation is released and the shock becomes collisionless. Adopting this interpretation of the thermal X-ray emission, a subsequent X-ray afterglow is predicted, due to synchrotron emission and inverse-Compton scattering of SN UV photons by electrons accelerated in the collisionless shock. Early optical-UV emission is also predicted, due to the cooling of the outer δM ~10^{-3} M_sun envelope of the star, which was heated to high temperature during shock passage. The observed X-ray afterglow and the early optical-UV emission are both consistent with those expected in this model. Detailed analysis of the early optical-UV emission may provide detailed constraints on the density distribution near the stellar surface.

preprint2007arXiv

Non-photonic emission from gamma-ray bursts

gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are likely sources of ultra-high energy, >10^{19} eV, protons and high energy, >1 TeV, neutrinos. Large volume detectors of ultra high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) and high energy neutrinos, which are already operating and are being expanded, may allow to test in the coming few years the predictions of the GRB model for high energy proton and neutrino production. Detection of the predicted signals will allow to identify the sources of UHECRs and will provide a unique probe, which may allow to resolve open questions related to the underlying physics of GRB models. Moreover, detection of GRB neutrinos will allow to test for neutrino properties (e.g., flavor oscillations for which tau&#39;s would be a unique signature, and coupling to gravity) with an accuracy many orders of magnitude better than is currently possible.

preprint2006arXiv

The shock break-out of GRB 060218/SN 2006aj

Although the link between long Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) and supernovae (SNe) has been established, hitherto there have been no observations of the beginning of a supernova explosion and its intimate link to a GRB. In particular, we do not know however how a GRB jet emerges from the star surface nor how a GRB progenitor explodes. Here we report on observations of the close GRB060218 and its connection to SN2006aj. In addition to the classical non-thermal emission, GRB060218 shows a thermal component in its X-ray spectrum, which cools and shifts into the optical/UV band as time passes. We interpret these features as arising from the break out of a shock driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the progenitor. Our observations allow us for the first time to catch a SN in the act of exploding, to directly observe the shock break-out and to provide strong evidence that the GRB progenitor was a Wolf-Rayet star.

preprint2004arXiv

High energy cosmic-rays from gamma-ray burst sources: A stronger case

The suggested association between the sources of gamma-ray bursts (GRB&#39;s) and the sources of ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECR&#39;s) is based on two arguments: (i) The average energy generation rate of UHECR&#39;s is similar to the gamma-ray generation rate of GRB&#39;s, and (ii) The constraints that UHECR sources must satisfy to allow proton acceleration to >10^{20} eV are similar to those inferred for GRB sources from gamma-ray observations. We show that recent GRB and UHECR observations strengthen both arguments, and hence strengthen the suggested association.

preprint2004arXiv

The Luminosity and Angular Distributions of Long GRBs

The realization that the total energy of GRBs is correlated with their jet break angles motivates the search for a similar relation between the peak luminosity, $L$, and the jet break angles, $L\proptoθ^{-2}$. Such a relation implies that the GRB luminosity function determines the angular distribution. We re-derive the GRB luminosity function using the BATSE peak flux distribution and compare the predicted distribution with the observed redshift distribution. The luminosity function can be approximated by a broken power law with a break peak luminosity of $4.4 \times 10^{51}$ erg/sec, a typical jet angle of 0.12 rad and a local GRB rate of $0.44 h_{65}^{3}$ Gpc$^{-3}$yr$^{-1}$. The angular distribution implied by $L\proptoθ^{-2}$ agrees well with the observed one, and implies a correction factor to the local rate due to beaming of $75\pm25$ (instead of 500 as commonly used). The inferred overall local GRB rate is $33\pm11 h_{65}^{3}$ Gpc$^{-3}$yr$^{-1}$. The luminosity function and angle distribution obtained within the universal structured jet model, where the angular distribution is essentially $\propto θ$ and hence the luminosity function must be $\propto L^{-2}$, deviate from the observations at low peak fluxes and, correspondingly, at large angles. The corresponding correction factor for the universal structure jet is $\sim 20 \pm 10$.