BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

E. Pehlke

E. Pehlke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.plasm-phcond-mat.stat-mech

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Comment on "Discussion on `Novel attractive force between ions in quantum plasmas -- failure of simulations based on a density functional approach"

In a recent article [P.K. Shukla, B. Eliasson and M. Akbari-Moghanjoughi, Physica Scripta {\bf 87}, 018202 (2013)] the authors criticized our analysis of the screened proton potential in dense hydrogen that was based on {\em ab initio} density functional theory (DFT) simulations [M. Bonitz, E. Pehlke, and T. Schoof, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 87}, 037102 (2013)]. In particular, they attributed the absence of the Shukla-Eliasson attractive force between protons in the DFT simulations to a failure of DFT. Here we discuss in detail their arguments and show that their conclusions are incorrect.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On "Novel attractive forces" between ions in quantum plasmas -- failure of linearized quantum hydrodynamics

In a recent letter [P.K. Shukla and B. Eliasson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 165007 (2012)] the discovery of a new attractive force between protons in a hydrogen plasma was reported that would be responsible for the formation of molecules and of a proton lattice. Here we show, based on ab initio density functional theory calculations, that these predictions are wrong and caused by using linearized quantum hydrodynamics beyond the limits of its applicability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Reply to comment of Shukla et al. on 'On "Novel attractive forces" between ions in quantum plasmas - failure of linearized quantum hydrodynamics'

In an earlier paper we demonstrated that the "novel attractive force" between protons in dense hydrogen reported by Shukla and Eliasson based on linearized quantum hydrodynamics (LQHD) is wrong. As benchmark results we used state of the art density functional theory (DFT) simulations. In their response to that paper Shukla et al. (arXiv:1112.5556) claimed that the disagreement is due to a failure of DFT. Here we show - by comparing the properties and limitations of DFT and QHD - that their statements have no scientific basis and that DFT is a suitable benchmark for more approximate approaches such as QHD and LQHD.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access