Source author record

E. Liokati

E. Liokati appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Magnetic helicity and energy of emerging solar active regions and their erruptivity

Aims. We investigate the role of the accumulation of both magnetic helicity and magnetic energy in the generation of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from emerging solar active regions (ARs). Methods. Using vector magnetic field data obtained by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager on board the Solar Dynamics Observatory, we calculate the magnetic helicity and magnetic energy injection rates as well as the resulting accumulated budgets in 52 emerging ARs from the start time of magnetic flux emergence until they reach heliographic longitude of 45$^{\circ}$ West (W45). Results. Seven of the ARs produced CMEs while 45 did not. In a statistical sense, the eruptive ARs accumulate larger budgets of both magnetic helicity and energy than the noneruptive ones over intervals that start from flux emergence start time and end (i) at the end of flux emergence phase, and (ii) when the AR produces its first CME or crosses W45, whichever happens first. We found magnetic helicity and energy thresholds of $9 \times 10^{41}$ Mx$^2$ and $2 \times 10^{32}$ erg, respectively, which, if crossed, ARs are likely to erupt. The segregation, in terms of accumulated magnetic helicity and energy budgets, of the eruptive ARs from the noneruptive ones is violated in one case when an AR erupts early in its emergence phase and in six cases with noneruptive ARs exhibiting large magnetic helicity and energy budgets. Decay index calculations may indicate that these ARs did not erupt because the overlying magnetic field provided stronger or more extended confinement than in eruptive ARs. Conclusions. Our results indicate that emerging ARs tend to produce CMEs when they accumulate significant budgets of both magnetic helicity and energy. Any study of their eruptive potential should place magnetic helicity on equal footing with magnetic energy.