Researcher profile

E. Lacchin

E. Lacchin contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Sub-parsec resolution cosmological simulations of star-forming clumps at high redshift with feedback of individual stars

We introduce a new set of zoom-in cosmological simulations with sub-pc resolution, intended to model extremely faint, highly magnified star-forming stellar clumps, detected at z=6.14 thanks to gravitational lensing. The simulations include feedback from individual massive stars (in both the pre-supernova and supernova phases), generated via stochastic, direct sampling of the stellar initial mass function. We adopt a modified 'delayed cooling' feedback scheme, specifically created to prevent artificial radiative loss of the energy injected by individual stars in very dense gas (n~10^3-10^5 cm^{-3}). The sites where star formation ignites are characterised by maximum densities of the order of 10^5 cm^{-3} and gravitational pressures P/k>10^7 K/cm^3, corresponding to the values of the local, turbulent regions where the densest stellar aggregates form. The total stellar mass at z=6.14 is 3.4x10^7 M_sun, in satisfactory agreement with the observed stellar mass of the observed systems. The most massive clumps have masses of ~10^6 M_sun and half-mass sizes of ~100 pc. These sizes are larger than the observed ones, including also other samples of lensed high-redshift clumps, and imply an average density one order of magnitude lower than the observed one. In the size-mass plane, our clumps populate a sequence that is intermediate between the ones of observed high-redshift clumps and local dSph galaxies.

preprint2020arXiv

Chemical evolution of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies: testing the IGIMF

We test the integrated galactic initial mass function (IGIMF) on the chemical evolution of 16 ultra-faint dwarf (UFD) galaxies discussing in detail the results obtained for three of them: Boötes I, Boötes II and Canes Venatici I, taken as prototypes of the smallest and the largest UFDs. These objects have very small stellar masses ($\sim 10^3-10^4 \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$) and quite low metallicities ([Fe/H]$<-1.0$ dex). We consider four observational constraints: the present-day stellar mass, the [$α$/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] relation, the stellar metallicity distribution function and the cumulative star formation history. Our model follows in detail the evolution of several chemical species (H, He, $α$-elements and Fe). We take into account detailed nucleosynthesis and gas flows (in and out). Our results show that the IGIMF, coupled with the very low star formation rate predicted by the model for these galaxies ($\sim 10^{-4}-10^{-6}\ \mathrm{M_{\odot}yr^{-1}}$), cannot reproduce the main chemical properties, because it implies a negligible number of core-collapse SNe and even Type Ia SNe, the most important polluters of galaxies. On the other hand, a constant classical Salpeter IMF gives the best agreement with data, but we cannot exclude that other formulations of the IGIMF could reproduce the properties of these galaxies. Comparing with Galaxy data we suggest that UFDs could not be the building blocks of the entire Galactic halo, although more data are necessary to draw firmer conclusions.