BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dustin Wehr

Dustin Wehr contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational Complexity

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

Lower bound for deterministic semantic-incremental branching programs solving GEN

We answer a problem posed in (Gál, Koucký, McKenzie 2008) regarding a restricted model of small-space computation, tailored for solving the GEN problem. They define two variants of "incremental branching programs", the syntactic variant defined by a restriction on the graph-theoretic paths in the program, and the more-general semantic variant in which the same restriction is enforced only on the consistent paths - those that are followed by at least one input. They show that exponential size is required for the syntactic variant, but leave open the problem of superpolynomial lower bounds for the semantic variant. Here we give an exponential lower bound for the semantic variant by generalizing lower bound arguments, from earlier work, for a similar restricted model tailored for solving a special case of GEN called Tree Evaluation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Pebbles and Branching Programs for Tree Evaluation

We introduce the Tree Evaluation Problem, show that it is in logDCFL (and hence in P), and study its branching program complexity in the hope of eventually proving a superlogarithmic space lower bound. The input to the problem is a rooted, balanced d-ary tree of height h, whose internal nodes are labeled with d-ary functions on [k] = {1,...,k}, and whose leaves are labeled with elements of [k]. Each node obtains a value in [k] equal to its d-ary function applied to the values of its d children. The output is the value of the root. We show that the standard black pebbling algorithm applied to the binary tree of height h yields a deterministic k-way branching program with Theta(k^h) states solving this problem, and we prove that this upper bound is tight for h=2 and h=3. We introduce a simple semantic restriction called "thrifty" on k-way branching programs solving tree evaluation problems and show that the same state bound of Theta(k^h) is tight (up to a constant factor) for all h >= 2 for deterministic thrifty programs. We introduce fractional pebbling for trees and show that this yields nondeterministic thrifty programs with Theta(k^{h/2+1}) states solving the Boolean problem "determine whether the root has value 1". We prove that this bound is tight for h=2,3,4, and tight for unrestricted nondeterministic k-way branching programs for h=2,3.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Pebbling and Branching Programs Solving the Tree Evaluation Problem

We study restricted computation models related to the Tree Evaluation Problem}. The TEP was introduced in earlier work as a simple candidate for the (*very*) long term goal of separating L and LogDCFL. The input to the problem is a rooted, balanced binary tree of height h, whose internal nodes are labeled with binary functions on [k] = {1,...,k} (each given simply as a list of k^2 elements of [k]), and whose leaves are labeled with elements of [k]. Each node obtains a value in [k] equal to its binary function applied to the values of its children, and the output is the value of the root. The first restricted computation model, called Fractional Pebbling, is a generalization of the black/white pebbling game on graphs, and arises in a natural way from the search for good upper bounds on the size of nondeterministic branching programs (BPs) solving the TEP - for any fixed h, if the binary tree of height h has fractional pebbling cost at most p, then there are nondeterministic BPs of size O(k^p) solving the height h TEP. We prove a lower bound on the fractional pebbling cost of d-ary trees that is tight to within an additive constant for each fixed d. The second restricted computation model we study is a semantic restriction on (non)deterministic BPs solving the TEP - Thrifty BPs. Deterministic (resp. nondeterministic) thrifty BPs suffice to implement the best known algorithms for the TEP, based on black (resp. fractional) pebbling. In earlier work, for each fixed h a lower bound on the size of deterministic thrifty BPs was proved that is tight for sufficiently large k. We give an alternative proof that achieves the same bound for all k. We show the same bound still holds in a less-restricted model, and also that gradually weaker lower bounds can be obtained for gradually weaker restrictions on the model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access