Source author record

Don Coppersmith

Don Coppersmith appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

On curves contained in convex subsets of the plane

If K' and K are convex bodies of the plane such that K' is a subset of K then the perimeter of K' is not greater than the perimeter of K. We obtain the following generalization of this fact. Let K be a convex compact body of the plane with the perimeter p and the diameter d and r>1 be an integer. Let s be the smallest number such that for any curve of length greater than s contained in K there is a straight line intersecting the curve at least in r+1 different points. Then s=rp/2 if r is even and s=(r-1)p/2+d if r is odd.

preprint2011arXiv

Binary Non-tiles

A subset V of GF(2)^n is a tile if GF(2)^n can be covered by disjoint translates of V. In other words, V is a tile if and only if there is a subset A of GF(2)^n such that V+A = GF(2)^n uniquely (i.e., v + a = v' + a' implies that v=v' and a=a' where v,v' in V and a,a' in A). In some problems in coding theory and hashing we are given a putative tile V, and wish to know whether or not it is a tile. In this paper we give two computational criteria for certifying that V is not a tile. The first involves impossibility of a bin-packing problem, and the second involves infeasibility of a linear program. We apply both criteria to a list of putative tiles given by Gordon, Miller, and Ostapenko in that none of them are, in fact, tiles.

preprint2003arXiv

Random MAX SAT, Random MAX CUT, and Their Phase Transitions

Given a 2-SAT formula $F$ consisting of $n$ variables and $\cn$ random clauses, what is the largest number of clauses $\max F$ satisfiable by a single assignment of the variables? We bound the answer away from the trivial bounds of $(3/4)cn$ and $cn$. We prove that for $c<1$, the expected number of clauses satisfiable is $\cn-Θ(1/n)$; for large $c$, it is $((3/4)c + Θ(\sqrt{c}))n$; for $c = 1+\eps$, it is at least $(1+\eps-O(\eps^3))n$ and at most $(1+\eps-Ω(\eps^3/\ln \eps))n$; and in the ``scaling window'' $c= 1+Θ(n^{-1/3})$, it is $cn-Θ(1)$. In particular, just as the decision problem undergoes a phase transition, our optimization problem also undergoes a phase transition at the same critical value $c=1$. Nearly all of our results are established without reference to the analogous propositions for decision 2-SAT, and as a byproduct we reproduce many of those results, including much of what is known about the 2-SAT scaling window. We consider ``online'' versions of MAX-2-SAT, and show that for one version, the obvious greedy algorithm is optimal. We can extend only our simplest MAX-2-SAT results to MAX-k-SAT, but we conjecture a ``MAX-k-SAT limiting function conjecture'' analogous to the folklore satisfiability threshold conjecture, but open even for $k=2$. Neither conjecture immediately implies the other, but it is natural to further conjecture a connection between them. Finally, for random MAXCUT (the size of a maximum cut in a sparse random graph) we prove analogous results.