BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Dominik Scheder

Dominik Scheder contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game Theorymath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

A New Bound for 3-Satisfiable MaxSat and its Algorithmic Application

Let F be a CNF formula with n variables and m clauses. F is 3-satisfiable if for any 3 clauses in F, there is a truth assignment which satisfies all of them. Lieberherr and Specker (1982) and, later, Yannakakis (1994) proved that in each 3-satisfiable CNF formula at least 2/3 of its clauses can be satisfied by a truth assignment. We improve this result by showing that every 3-satisfiable CNF formula F contains a subset of variables U, such that some truth assignment $τ$ will satisfy at least $2m/3+ m_U/3+ρn'$ clauses, where m is the number of clauses of F, m_U is the number of clauses of F containing a variable from U, n' is the total number of variables in clauses not containing a variable in U, and ρis a positive absolute constant. Both U and $τ$ can be found in polynomial time. We use our result to show that the following parameterized problem is fixed-parameter tractable and, moreover, has a kernel with a linear number of variables. In 3-S-MAXSAT-AE, we are given a 3-satisfiable CNF formula F with m clauses and asked to determine whether there is an assignment which satisfies at least 2m/3 + k clauses, where k is the parameter.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

In Defense of Bureaucracy in the Metric Facility Location Problem

Our work is devoted to the metric facility location problem and addresses the selfish behavior of the players. It contributes to the line of work initiated by Procaccia and Tennenholtz [EC09] on approximate mechanism design without money. We explore and argue for an intuitive and simple rule of complexity O(nk),a so-called proportionality mechanism. The mechanism works in k consecutive rounds,each time choosing a random player at whose position to place the next facility; each time the probabilities of players to be picked are distributed proportionally to their distances to the current set of the facilities. Lu et al. [EC10] showed that the proportionality rule is incentive compatible for k=1,2, but fails to be so for k>2. We tweak the model slightly such that for any k, the proportionality mechanism becomes incentive compatible. In the new model we allow the government to be bureaucratic, i.e., to have the power of to force each player to choose from only a specific set of available facilities. In the proportionality mechanism, we force every player that receives a facility at his reported location to connect to exactly that facility. We extend the proportionality mechanism to a more general setting with a private network of facilities already present in the metric space and show that it is truthful as well. We further show that for any fixed k, the proportionality rule achieves in expectation a constant approximation guarantee to the optimal solution; namely at most a ratio of 4k. On the other hand, we show a lower bound of ln k(1+o(1)), and we suspect the truth to be closer to this lower bound. Thus, our work is the first among those on incentive compatible facility location that treats effectively (with a constant factor of approximation) the general case of an arbitrary number of facilities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Improving PPSZ for 3-SAT using Critical Variables

A critical variable of a satisfiable CNF formula is a variable that has the same value in all satisfying assignments. Using a simple case distinction on the fraction of critical variables of a CNF formula, we improve the running time for 3-SAT from O(1.32216^n) by Rolf [2006] to O(1.32153^n). Using a different approach, Iwama et al. [2010] very recently achieved a running time of O(1.32113^n). Our method nicely combines with theirs, yielding the currently fastest known algorithm with running time O(1.32065^n). We also improve the bound for 4-SAT from O(1.47390^n) [Iwama, Tamaki 2004] to O(1.46928^n), where O(1.46981^n) can be obtained using the methods of [Iwama, Tamaki 2004] and [Rolf 2006].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Unsatisfiable CNF Formulas need many Conflicts

A pair of clauses in a CNF formula constitutes a conflict if there is a variable that occurs positively in one clause and negatively in the other. A CNF formula without any conflicts is satisfiable. The Lovasz Local Lemma implies that a k-CNF formula is satisfiable if each clause conflicts with at most 2^k/e-1 clauses. It does not, however, give any good bound on how many conflicts an unsatisfiable formula has globally. We show here that every unsatisfiable k-CNF formula requires 2.69^k conflicts and there exist unsatisfiable k-CNF formulas with 3.51^k conflicts.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Unsatisfiable Linear CNF Formulas Are Large and Complex

We call a CNF formula linear if any two clauses have at most one variable in common. We show that there exist unsatisfiable linear k-CNF formulas with at most 4k^2 4^k clauses, and on the other hand, any linear k-CNF formula with at most 4^k/(8e^2k^2) clauses is satisfiable. The upper bound uses probabilistic means, and we have no explicit construction coming even close to it. One reason for this is that unsatisfiable linear formulas exhibit a more complex structure than general (non-linear) formulas: First, any treelike resolution refutation of any unsatisfiable linear k-CNF formula has size at least 2^(2^(k/2-1))$. This implies that small unsatisfiable linear k-CNF formulas are hard instances for Davis-Putnam style splitting algorithms. Second, if we require that the formula F have a strict resolution tree, i.e. every clause of F is used only once in the resolution tree, then we need at least a^a^...^a clauses, where a is approximately 2 and the height of this tower is roughly k.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Using a Skewed Hamming Distance to Speed Up Deterministic Local Search

Schoening presents a simple randomized algorithm for (d,k)-CSP problems with running time (d(k-1)/k)^n poly(n). Here, d is the number of colors, k is the size of the constraints, and n is the number of variables. A derandomized version of this, given by Dantsin et al., achieves a running time of (dk/(k+1))^n poly(n), inferior to Schoening's. We come up with a simple modification of the deterministic algorithm, achieving a running time of (d(k-1)/k * k^d/(k^d-1))^n \poly(n). Though not completely eleminating the gap, this comes very close to the randomized bound for all but very small values of d. Our main idea is to define a graph structure on the set of d colors to speed up local search.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access