Researcher profile

Dmitry Lachinov

Dmitry Lachinov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

CHAOS Challenge -- Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation

Segmentation of abdominal organs has been a comprehensive, yet unresolved, research field for many years. In the last decade, intensive developments in deep learning (DL) have introduced new state-of-the-art segmentation systems. In order to expand the knowledge on these topics, the CHAOS - Combined (CT-MR) Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation challenge has been organized in conjunction with IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2019, in Venice, Italy. CHAOS provides both abdominal CT and MR data from healthy subjects for single and multiple abdominal organ segmentation. Five different but complementary tasks have been designed to analyze the capabilities of current approaches from multiple perspectives. The results are investigated thoroughly, compared with manual annotations and interactive methods. The analysis shows that the performance of DL models for single modality (CT / MR) can show reliable volumetric analysis performance (DICE: 0.98 $\pm$ 0.00 / 0.95 $\pm$ 0.01) but the best MSSD performance remain limited (21.89 $\pm$ 13.94 / 20.85 $\pm$ 10.63 mm). The performances of participating models decrease significantly for cross-modality tasks for the liver (DICE: 0.88 $\pm$ 0.15 MSSD: 36.33 $\pm$ 21.97 mm) and all organs (DICE: 0.85 $\pm$ 0.21 MSSD: 33.17 $\pm$ 38.93 mm). Despite contrary examples on different applications, multi-tasking DL models designed to segment all organs seem to perform worse compared to organ-specific ones (performance drop around 5\%). Besides, such directions of further research for cross-modality segmentation would significantly support real-world clinical applications. Moreover, having more than 1500 participants, another important contribution of the paper is the analysis on shortcomings of challenge organizations such as the effects of multiple submissions and peeking phenomena.

preprint2020arXiv

Cephalometric Landmark Regression with Convolutional Neural Networks on 3D Computed Tomography Data

In this paper, we address the problem of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric analysis. Cephalometric analysis performed on lateral radiographs doesn't fully exploit the structure of 3D objects due to projection onto the lateral plane. With the development of three-dimensional imaging techniques such as CT, several analysis methods have been proposed that extend to the 3D case. The analysis based on these methods is invariant to rotations and translations and can describe difficult skull deformation, where 2D cephalometry has no use. In this paper, we provide a wide overview of existing approaches for cephalometric landmark regression. Moreover, we perform a series of experiments with state of the art 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) based methods for keypoint regression: direct regression with CNN, heatmap regression and Softargmax regression. For the first time, we extensively evaluate the described methods and demonstrate their effectiveness in the estimation of Frankfort Horizontal and cephalometric points locations for patients with severe skull deformations. We demonstrate that Heatmap and Softargmax regression models provide sufficient regression error for medical applications (less than 4 mm). Moreover, the Softargmax model achieves 1.15o inclination error for the Frankfort horizontal. For the fair comparison with the prior art, we also report results projected on the lateral plane.